Sentence examples for argued accurately from inspiring English sources

Key conservatives in the House argued — accurately — that the deal would save Obamacare rather than repeal and replace it, and came out against it.

He argued — accurately — that Mrs. Clinton had been a vocal proponent of the American intervention in Libya in 2011, which Mr. Obama has repeatedly acknowledged was the most ill-thought-out foreign policy move in his nearly eight years in office.

Researchers have argued (accurately) that research discoveries were not always predictable, accidental findings happened and what might be an uninteresting discovery in one field might have immense importance in another.

Mr Calderón argues, accurately enough, that this time the recession was caused not by government mistakes but by slumping exports to the United States (as well as a fall in remittances and tourists from there).

He argues, accurately enough, that the central political question has usually been defined as whether there should be more or less political integration a tug-of-war between "Brussels" and the nation-state.

Although it has publicly dismissed a Potter-enhanced Universal as being even a remote threat, arguing (accurately, analysts say) that a rising tide in Orlando lifts all boats, Disney is privately concerned about preventing market share erosion on both coasts.

Jones and other members of the Newsnight team believed that the posting was not correct, arguing, accurately as it turned out, that Rippon's statement that all the women interviewed for the abandoned Savile story had previously spoken to the police was incorrect.

Muslims will argue, accurately, that the incidence of rape is higher in Western countries than in Islam, where women are more comprehensively protected.

Using the DoS-based Dendrogram (based on the DoS residues predicted by KINspect), we have provided an alternative evolutionary explanation of the human kinome, which we argue, more accurately reflects functional diversity and specificity evolution.

It is perhaps accurately argued that the benchmark is set at a 2 1 because there are so many graduates achieving this grade, so why should they consider those who attain below this?

He also said that polls are "not dynamic" and therefore, he argued, do not accurately reflect people's changing attitudes toward certain politicians.