The phrase "argue on whether" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used when discussing a topic or issue that is subject to debate or differing opinions. Here is an example: "The students were asked to write an essay and argue on whether schools should implement a dress code policy." In this example, the phrase "argue on whether" is used to indicate that the students were expected to present arguments and counterarguments to support their opinion on the topic of dress codes in schools.
To arrive at its ruling in the case, the court will have to answer a sequence of questions, beginning with the one argued on Monday, whether the court may review the law yet.
The teams sometimes argue on the discussion board about whether their predictions would be better if they knew that customer No. 465 is, for example, a 23-year-old woman in Arizona.
So regardless of whether Republicans argue on the basis of principle: that it is important to be able to gum up the works and prevent change or because of political calculation: they want to be able to continue to oppose the Democrats' agenda, it undercuts their argument that Democrats have failed to deliver on their change mandate.
Do not argue on locations.
One floor up, lawyers for Lilly and the state argued on, debating whether Zyprexa's benefits outweighed its risks — a choice Mr. Bigley, sound mind or not, had already made.
Bloch could consider weighing in on whether the Jets' owner, Woody Johnson, is wandering into James L. Dolan territory with his handling of the Darrelle Revis holdout, as Ian O'Connor argues on ESPN.com, or whether it is officially hilarious that the Raiders' owner, Al Davis, is playing the role of whoopee cushion in this tale, as Gregg Doyel writes on CBSSports.com.com
But the issues raised by the Charleston experience reverberate still -- and far beyond the confines of a Supreme Court case, to be argued on Oct. 4, on whether the warrantless drug tests amounted to unconstitutional searches.
"We can argue later on whether Santorum is the right person to nominate or Gingrich is," he said.
Lester has denied any wrongdoing, the tweets have (shockingly) vanished and there's been a lot of arguing on the internet about whether or not Lester may have violated any rules, written or unwritten.
The issue that will be argued on Oct. 8 is whether to remove the limit, in place for almost four decades, on the aggregate amounts any contributor can give directly to candidates and parties for federal elections in a single cycle.
