The phrase "arguably of interest" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a topic or subject that may be considered interesting or noteworthy, but where the level of interest is subjective.
Example: "The findings of the study are arguably of interest to researchers in the field of environmental science."
Alternatives: "potentially interesting" or "possibly noteworthy".
hsa-miR-30b is arguably of most interest because, in addition to its high-level expression in cell lines which is closely correlated with amplification, it showed the greatest frequency of elevated expression in primary tumours (over 50% of cases), with expression levels detected in certain cases equivalent to those observed in amplified cell lines.
The estimate is arguably the parameter of interest from a policy perspective: it is the causal effect of ART eligibility for all patients seeking care with CD4 counts close to the threshold.
While his work on simulation and the postmodern break from the mid-1970s inthethe 1980s provides a paradigmatic postmodern theory and analysis of postmodernity that has been highly influential, and that despite its exaggerations continues to be of use in interpreting present social trends, his later work is arguably of more literary interest.
Of arguably greater interest was the reactivity and regioselectivity of non-symmetric dienophiles.
Arguably, the interest of researchers from computer science and multi-agent systems for judgment aggregation lead to the definition of more concrete aggregation rules and to the investigation of their relations.
After all, fees are higher than on passive products and clients are more likely to switch managers on a regular basis, an activity that tends to reduce returns.The authors suggest thatConsultants face a conflict of interest, as arguably they have a vested interest in complexity.
Arguably this becomes even more of interest as the analysis here show some results that were unexpected and raise questions regarding how to interpret and understand them that challenge some common explanations utilized in space syntax research.
Where intracranial temperature is the key temperature of interest, as it arguably is in stroke and traumatic brain injury, their data show the importance of measuring this.
Yet the challenge to the validity of the entire health science literature posed by PBIS – arguably a greater issue than conflict of interest, traditional publication bias, or any other commonly discussed threat to the integrity of the literature – has not received the attention it deserves.
This ideal holds up the commitment to lifelong fidelity and support by two sexually different human beings — a commitment that involves the mutual surrender, arguably, of their reproductive self-interest — as a uniquely admirable kind of relationship.
