The phrase "arguably flawed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that can be considered flawed, but there is room for debate or differing opinions on the matter.
Example: "The theory presented in the paper is arguably flawed, as it overlooks several key factors that could influence the outcome."
Alternatives: "potentially flawed" or "possibly flawed".
Because personal assistants in Illinois were partial rather than full-fledged public employees and because Abood was arguably flawed, "we refuse to extend Abood to the new situation now before us," the court declared.
Despite an arguably flawed relationship, these two will always be the faces of young and unequivocal love.
And, on top of that, to determine the effectiveness of a teacher based on standardized tests are arguably flawed," Gregson added.
Research into the matter is often limited (and, arguably, flawed) in its methodology and focus; short term spikes in aggression can be given undue prominence, while meaningful studies are often misrepresented by tabloid newspapers looking for something easy to blame the latest gun tragedy on.
But while the exercise may make for good politics, as a philosophical proposition it is arguably deeply flawed.
The result is a film that is, in part, a cathartic liberal revenge fantasy, but one so deeply flawed that it arguably reinforces the sins it decries.
I concede that this is arguably a flaw, an artefactual silence that drains the situation of its political reality.
A less political animal than Banerjee would be hard to imagine, but if objectivity is the great strength of Poor Economics, its political detachment is also arguably its flaw.
The abstruseness of some of "The Shining" is arguably a flaw, but "Room 237" reminds you that only an artistic work that resists tidy explanation can accommodate such enjoyable flights of interpretive fancy.
And its only sanction, beyond a written warning, is to recommend suspension or expulsion from the party.Any ethics committee which is incapable of blocking the candidacy of a man as patently flawed as Lord Archer is arguably pretty pointless.
Foley had been Australia's arguably steady-eddie choice at No.10 ahead of the unpredictable, defensively flawed Quade Cooper, but there was nothing wrong with him in attack either.
