Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "arguable results" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing outcomes or findings that are open to interpretation or debate.
Example: "The study produced arguable results, leading to differing opinions among the researchers."
Alternatives: "debatable outcomes" or "contentious findings".
Exact(1)
These tools enable a pretty precise understanding of protocol mechanisms but, under certain circumstances, provide arguable results on performances: the reason lies in the resources available to precisely implement protocol entities and in the simplistic descriptions of physical and channel phenomena.
Similar(58)
An arguable issue is whether Bonferroni correction should be applied in the first place.
It is arguable that the results of this research may have been influenced by the nature of the Delphi panel.
It's arguable that the result is a watered-down variant, bolstered by cringeworthy samples and garish electro music.
Accuracy of the results is arguable regarding the practical issues, for example, vibration or trapped air bubble.
While a meta-analysis of Marshall et al. [ 57 ] revealed only small relationships of media use time and body fatness with arguable clinical relevance, the results of the present study indicate a relevant association.
Comparative genomic studies that included the first archaeal genome that was sequenced, Methanococcus jannaschii, resulted in arguable conclusions [ 25].
In the routine clinical setting, a parallel infection with this high number of different viruses is uncommon up to impossible, and the clinical relevance of these results is initially arguable.
Of the various assumptions made here, two are arguable and critical to the result: the assumption that lower socioeconomic position means a greater rate of extrinsic hazard, and the assumption that health behaviors have some cost in terms of other components of fitness.
Censorship isn't the answer to arguable content.
While it is arguable whether support for creationism is a result of a general lack of understanding of evolutionary theory, results based on nationwide polls (Newport 2004) and revitalized anti-evolution pressures (Berman 2003; Coyne 2005; Holden 2005; Matzke 2004; Scott and Branch 2003; Shipman 2005) make us think that Almquist and Cronin's (1988) statements are still true today.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com