The phrase "arguable question" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a question that is open to debate or discussion, where different opinions or interpretations may exist.
Example: "The topic of climate change raises an arguable question about the effectiveness of current policies in reducing carbon emissions."
Alternatives: "debatable question" or "contentious question".
It was also arguable that the question of citizenship was independent from the withdrawal agreement currently being negotiated with the UK.
Both questions are arguable.
But like a half-dozen or so new biotechnology drugs with a similar combination — alluring promise, high price and only arguable benefits — Avastin raises troubling questions: What does it mean to say an expensive drug works?
"What is art?" is a question that is endlessly arguable, but all four have been invited to exhibit in galleries, and some of Mr. Livert's bowling balls have been displayed in a world-class art museum (albeit in the restrooms).
"What is art?" is a question that is endlessly arguable, but all four have been invited to exhibit in galleries, and some of Mr. Livert's bowling balls have even been displayed in a world-class art museum, albeit in the restrooms.
Based on responses from teen girls regarding questions about their body image, it's arguable the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue could end up having the positive impact on young girls that the Dove real women campaign tried, but some in the industry, believe failed to.
The question is: why did Barnet ever think it had an arguable case to pick on one group of residents to shoulder an additional tax?" The leader of Barnet Council, Councillor Richard Cornelius, said that the council's price and spending is "very much in line with other London boroughs".
However, it is arguable that this does not so much address as by-pass the underlying question.
"You don't have to name a solicitor". The trouble is that the forms are 14 pages long, and include questions like: "Please describe why you consider there is an arguable breach of substantive obligation".
Lord Justice Pill said: "Mr Davies has not persuaded us that it is arguable that the judge's general conclusions were unjustified". On the trial's central question of Auschwitz, said Lord Justice Pill, Mr Irving argued that the evidence for mass gassing at the camp was nowhere near so strong that it was perverse for him to entertain doubts about it.
