The phrase "arguable issue" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a topic or matter that is open to debate or discussion, where different viewpoints can be presented.
Example: "The environmental impact of the new policy is an arguable issue that requires further examination and debate."
Alternatives: "debatable topic" or "contentious matter".
"How much in society should any of us be held liable today when we lived a good life, an upstanding life by all accounts, and then something that maybe is an arguable issue took place in high school?" Fleischer said on Fox News.
But the rhetoric that stands out most starkly to me as a survivor of an adolescent rape are arguments like that of former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer, who said on Fox News, "How much in society should any of us be held liable today when we lived a good life, an upstanding life by all accounts, and then something that maybe is an arguable issue took place in high school?
An arguable issue is whether Bonferroni correction should be applied in the first place.
However it is arguable that issues raised by women and midwives in this study have relevance to women with lower BMIs and that future work should take a more inclusive approach.
It is arguable whether the issue of the VPF tiling format is more of a limitation of GIS systems vis-à-vis the VPF format, rather than an inherent limitation of the format itself.
Even accepting the Court's requirement, one would have to perceive an 'arguable' issue in Anders' case in order to remand it for a new appeal.
459, 15 L.Ed.2d 453, was based on the premise that prior to Griffin the practice of commenting on the defendant's silence was well established and thus did not raise an 'arguable' issue.
To say the legal issue is "arguable" is to say there is legitimate doubt as to whether the Constitution prohibits the government from executing citizens who are living outside the United States on the sole basis that the president believes the killing would make the nation more secure.
Accuracy of the results is arguable regarding the practical issues, for example, vibration or trapped air bubble.
Therefore, we ask this Court to strike Exhibits 1, 4-18, 23-25 and 29 to plaintiff's Opposition because these materials have no arguable relevance to the issues on summary judgment and are improperly prejudicial.
It is arguable that financially material sustainability issues will be captured on the business axis — but what about the stakeholder axis?
