The phrase "area categories" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to different classifications or types of areas within a specific context, such as geography, demographics, or organizational structures.
Example: "The report divides the regions into three distinct area categories: urban, suburban, and rural."
Alternatives: "zone classifications" or "region types".
Boitani, L. et al. Change the IUCN protected area categories to reflect biodiversity outcomes.
For both GEO and IPBES, we present regional and subregional summary statistics for the coverage of land and sea by different protected area categories.
Drawn from over 20 different countries, the book covers examples of sacred natural sites from all of IUCN's protected area categories and governance types.
Global summary statistics for the coverage of land and sea by different protected area categories are presented in the Protected Planet reports (Fig. 2.8 in Juffe-Bignoli et al.10).10
Since the parameters used in research are categorical, "Chi-Squared test for single sample" is used in identifying significant deviation between observed and expected values of intelligence area categories.
Rather than impose terrestrially-motivated ideas about protected areas onto freshwaters, we propose new vocabulary –freshwater focal area, critical management zone, and catchment management zone – that can be used in conjunction with IUCN protected area categories and that recognize the special ecological dynamics of freshwaters, and in particular the critical role of fluvial processes.
Statistical analysis for the primary endpoint included construction of a clinical risk model, area under the receiver operating curve (ROC area), category-free net reclassification index (cfNRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
We rate the reliability of these areas as follows: category A strong candidate for strain-accumulated area; category B a candidate with some uncertainty; and category C a minor candidate that does not show a large area of slip deficit and has a large uncertainty.
There was a greater number of Ts65Dn PNNs of the highest area (category 4) and lower number in the smallest area (category 1) compared with LMCs.
In the reduced dataset, study areas in which C. gattii were observed <20 times were lumped together in the "other area" category.
During the study, none of the patients received assistance within the scope of interventions connected with the monitoring of CNS function; no interventions performed by nurses were observed in this area (category 5 of the TISS-28 scale).
