are you again

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are you again" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express surprise or annoyance at someone's repeated actions or presence, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "Are you again interrupting my meeting with your questions?"

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

21 human-written examples

Who are you, again?

The New York Times

Which Susie are you again?

The Times

"Who are you again?" And so on.

The New York Times

What kind of warrior are you again?

The Guardian - TV & Radio

It's her reply to the question "Who are you?" Again the wrong question.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

As I opened up to friends and family members, they prodded me with questions: "What do you mean you can't get pregnant?" and "How old are you again?" I was 32.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

39 human-written examples

Now you can be you again".

The Guardian

"You can cut your hair and be you again".

The New Yorker

Has it changed, or were you, again, not properly briefed?

The Guardian

"The only thing a cookie does is remember that it's you again.

Forbes

You will be you again.

HuffPost

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and grammatical correctness, replace "are you again" with phrases like "Are you doing that again?" or "Are you here again?" to ensure your message is easily understood.

Common error

Avoid using "are you again" in formal writing. This phrasing deviates from standard English grammar and can make your writing appear unpolished or unclear. Opt for grammatically correct alternatives to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are you again" functions as an interrogative clause, aiming to elicit information about a repeated action or presence. Ludwig indicates that this phrase is not grammatically correct in standard English. Instead, alternatives such as "are you doing that again?" are preferable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Academia

21%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Science

15%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are you again" appears across various sources, including news, academia, and wikis, it is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. As Ludwig AI suggests, alternative phrasings such as "Are you doing that again?" or "Are you here again?" are recommended for clarity and grammatical accuracy. Though its communicative purpose is to question repeated actions or presence, its informal register makes it less suitable for formal writing. When writing, prioritize grammatically sound alternatives for professional or academic contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Are you doing that again?

Focuses on the action being repeated, adding specificity.

Are you here again?

Emphasizes the repeated presence of someone.

You're doing it again?

Expresses mild surprise or exasperation about a repeated action.

You're back again?

Highlights the return of someone or something.

Are you repeating yourself?

Specifically addresses the act of reiterating something.

Did you do that again?

Inquires about a past repeated action.

Are you going there again?

Questions a return to a specific place or situation.

Is this happening again?

Expresses dismay that an event is recurring.

You're making the same mistake again?

Highlights the repetition of an error.

Are you bothering me again?

Highlights the repetition of an annoyance.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are you again" to be grammatically correct?

Instead of "are you again", consider using alternatives such as "are you doing that again", "are you here again", or "you're doing it again" for clarity.

What does "are you again" imply in informal conversation?

In informal contexts, "are you again" might imply surprise, annoyance, or gentle teasing about a repeated action or presence. However, it's not grammatically standard and could be misunderstood.

Is "are you again" ever considered correct in English?

No, "are you again" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's advisable to use alternative phrasings that follow standard grammar rules for clear communication.

What's a more formal way to ask if someone is repeating an action?

For a more formal approach, you could ask, "are you repeating yourself?" This phrasing is grammatically correct and suitable for professional settings.