Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are worked for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are worked for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be an attempt to express that something is done for someone or something, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "The resources are worked for by the team to ensure project success."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Formal & Business
Wiki
Alternative expressions(19)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
Limestone is the most important mineral quarried, mainly for roads and cement; shale is extracted for cement at Hope, and several gritstone quarries are worked for housing.
Wiki
Another fact that is hard to digest is that the animals that are not killed -- those that are worked for milk, eggs and other products -- actually face a longer life of abuse, especially those that are used as breeding animals.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
They are working for you.
News & Media
"They are working for their own interests".
News & Media
We are working for that".
News & Media
"They are working for a better future.
News & Media
"The miners are working for treasures.
Formal & Business
It's worked for them before.
News & Media
"It's worked for us".
News & Media
It's worked for years.
News & Media
It's worked for me.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "are worked for" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives such as "are used for" or "are intended for" to ensure clarity and professionalism.
Common error
A common mistake is to assume that "are worked for" correctly conveys passive voice. Instead, ensure the passive construction uses a more appropriate verb that reflects the intended meaning, such as "are utilized by" or "are developed for."
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are worked for" attempts to express a passive construction, suggesting that something is being acted upon for a particular purpose. However, based on Ludwig AI the phrase is not grammatically correct in standard English.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
33%
Wiki
33%
Less common in
Science
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "are worked for" appears in various sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The intended meaning revolves around expressing the purpose or aim behind an action, but more suitable alternatives like "are used for", "are intended for", or "are designed for" should be used instead to make it clear and appropriate in both formal and informal contexts. Despite appearing in News & Media, Formal & Business, and Wiki contexts, its infrequent use suggests it should be avoided in favor of more standard English constructions. When in doubt, always consider clearer alternatives to improve communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are intended for
This alternative focuses on the intended purpose or recipient of the work, shifting the emphasis from the action to the target.
are designed for
This suggests a deliberate creation with a specific function in mind, highlighting the design aspect.
are utilized for
This alternative emphasizes the practical use of something, focusing on its application in a particular context.
are used for
A simple and direct way of stating the purpose or function, it is very common and widely understood.
are geared towards
This suggests a specific direction or target that the work is aimed at, highlighting the directional aspect.
are developed for
Focuses on the creation or evolution of something to meet a specific need or purpose.
are striving for
This alternative shifts the focus to the effort being made to achieve a specific outcome or goal.
are aiming for
Indicates a specific target or objective that is being pursued, highlighting the aspirational element.
are laboring for
This alternative emphasizes the hard work and effort involved in pursuing a particular goal.
are toiling for
Similar to "are laboring for", this highlights the strenuous and persistent nature of the work.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "are worked for" to be more grammatically correct?
Instead of "are worked for", you can use phrases like "are used for", "are intended for", or "are utilized for" depending on the context.
Is "are worked for" considered formal or informal language?
The phrase "are worked for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. Opt for more standard alternatives to ensure clarity.
What is a more common and acceptable alternative to "are worked for"?
More common alternatives include "are designed for", "are geared towards", or "are developed for", which clearly express the intended purpose or function.
In what contexts might I mistakenly use "are worked for", and how can I correct it?
You might mistakenly use "are worked for" when trying to express that something is being used or developed for a specific purpose. Correct this by using a more precise verb such as "are used by" or "are created for" to accurately convey your intended meaning.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested