Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "are winner" is not correct in English.
It should be "are winners" to be grammatically accurate. You can use the corrected phrase when referring to multiple individuals or entities who have achieved victory or success in a competition or context.
Example: "The athletes who finished the race are winners, celebrating their hard work and dedication."
Alternatives: "are champions" or "are victors."
Exact(11)
You are winner!
Quite a few of those contests are "winner takes all": and Mr McCain is on a roll.
It is perhaps the harshest aspect of the tennis scoring system: sets and games — no matter how close — are winner take all.
Mr Yanukovich fares little better, at around 20%, but if the rules are "winner takes all, loser goes to jail," perhaps he doesn't want to take any chances.Most alarmingly for the president, his popularity is tottering even in his heartland.
Replace all the negative self talk with positive mantras constantly reminding yourself that you are winner.
How delegates commit support to a candidate differs by state — some are "winner takes all," where all of the state's delegates are assigned to whichever candidate wins the greatest number of votes determined either through caucusing or primary voting.
Similar(49)
All three are winner-take-all contests.
U.S. elections are winner-take-all events.
In many states, Republican primaries, unlike Democratic ones, are winner-takes-all.
Florida and Ohio vote on 15 March and are winner-takes-all.
That is often the case with legislation, but hardly ever in elections, because they are winner-take-all.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com