Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "are we have" is not correct and usable in written English.
It appears to be a grammatical error and does not convey a clear meaning in any context.
Example: "Are we have enough resources for the project?" is incorrect.
Alternatives: "Do we have" or "Are we possessing".
Exact(58)
"If they are, we have to intervene.
"Of course they are; we have no problem with that.
However inclusive we are, we have standards to maintain".
Whatever the reasons are we have no edge to us, no hunger to our games.
We are a lot more robust than people think we are, we have shown that".
Bankers being the incompetent rascals they are, we have been wondering where Wallace keeps his money.
We are where we are: We have President George W. Bush!
So goes the human continuum: whenever we are, we have been.
Somehow, scruffy and flawed as we are, we have to be able to identify with her.
'The latest reasons are we have to move for health and safety and for insurance.
Similar(1)
"We have to do more than say 'this isn't who we are.' We have to prove it through our policies, our laws, our actions, and our votes," Obama wrote on Facebook.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com