Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "are validated with experimental" is not correct as it is incomplete.
It should be "are validated with experimental data" or "are validated with experimental results" to be grammatically correct and usable in written English. You can use it when discussing the process of confirming or verifying findings through experimental methods.
Example: "The hypotheses are validated with experimental data collected during the study."
Alternatives: "are confirmed through experimental" or "are supported by experimental".
Exact(40)
The simulations are validated with experimental data.
Developed models are validated with experimental data.
The calculated results are validated with experimental data.
The obtained results are validated with experimental results.
The simulation results are validated with experimental studies.
The results of the analysis are validated with experimental data.
Similar(20)
The algorithm was validated with experimental data from 12 different biological macromolecules.
The effect is validated with experimental testing.
It was validated with experimental data.
The model is validated with experimental data.
The numerical simulation model is validated with experimental results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com