Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "are us all" is not correct in standard written English.
It appears to be a grammatical error, as the correct form would typically involve "we" or "us" in a different structure.
Example: "We are all in this together."
Alternatives: "include us all" or "are all of us."
Exact(1)
Neither explanation is correct of course - the targets are us, all of us.
Similar(59)
This is us all right.
That's us all over.
It was us, all of us.
That's us all done and dusted for the day.
All are US citizens.
He was us, he was all of us".
"They're approaching us all the time".
"It's making us all very jittery".
He is pushing us all the time.
And it's got us all hooked".
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com