Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "are typically much faster" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the speed of two or more things, indicating that one is generally quicker than the other.
Example: "Electric cars are typically much faster than traditional gasoline vehicles in terms of acceleration."
Alternatives: "are generally quicker" or "tend to be significantly faster."
Exact(2)
On the other hand, solid-state devices are typically much faster.
Furthermore, the assumption of metabolic steady-state is usually valid since the intracellular dynamics are typically much faster than extracellular dynamics [ 1] and metabolite concentrations generally equilibrate in a much shorter time (in seconds) compared to the time-scale of genetic regulation (in minutes) [ 3- 5].
Similar(58)
Hence, taking l∼100 μm to be the distance between capillaries, the equilibration rate k eq∼20 h−1 for tracer is typically much faster than the binding rate, and comparable to the rate of extravasation, k 1.
Outside America, prices are typically much higher.
Males are typically much larger than females.
USDs are typically much louder than USIs.
Scrolling up and down is typically much more acceptable.
As Bayesian inference is typically very much faster than even a single ML run, not to mention than e.g. 100 or 1000 replicate runs required to estimate bootstrap proportions, ASRV-corrected Bayesian inference must be seen as an important alternative for statistically based phylogenetic analysis of protein-sequence data when computational resources are limiting.
However, these cells are typically capable of much faster charging, if one ensures that the thermal and electrode-specific voltage profiles do not exceed safety limits.
Internet connections are typically significantly faster downloading than uploading.
In MC codes, read-only cross section data tables are accessed frequently, exhibit poor locality, and are typically too much large to fit in fast memory.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com