Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "are typically interested" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing general tendencies or common interests of a group of people or entities.
Example: "Students are typically interested in subjects that relate to their future careers."
Alternatives: "usually have an interest" or "commonly show interest".
Dictionary
are typically interested
adverb
In a typical or common manner.
Exact(18)
Part of the problem, says Chris Kane, chief customer strategy officer at Kane Is Able, is that firms with products to ship are typically interested only in their own supply lines to retailers, and fail to consider opportunities to collaborate.
Lawyers are typically interested in the question: What is the law on a particular issue?
When philosophers discuss prophecy, they are typically interested in prophecies concerning the contingent future, so that will be the focus in the remainder of this article.
We are typically interested in parameters β, γ and δ in the following equation: boldsymbol{Y}=alphaboldsymbol{iota}mathbfbetatilde{boldsymbol{G}}boldsymbol{Y}+boldsymbol{X}{boldsymbol{gamma}} +tilde{boldsymbol{G}}boldsymbol{X}{boldsymbol{delta}}+boldsymbol{L}tilde{boldsymbol{nu}}+{boldsymbol{varepsilon}} (21).
Donors are typically interested in rapid results.
When simulating grain surface chemistry, we are typically interested in rare events, such as diffusion and desorption.
Similar(38)
An immigrant is typically interested in getting a job, while victims of human trafficking are lured for the purpose of performing forced work or sex acts.
In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research one is typically interested in neural activity.
As one is typically interested in the (small) MISs with only few interventions and because the computation of MISs with higher cardinality is the most time-consuming part, CNA allows to set a maximum cardinality.
When looking for putative antiviral drug targets, one is typically interested in candidates that have a significant impact on infection outcome in the specific virus under consideration, or possibly even in several different viral species if e.g. broadly acting antivirals are sought for.
The clinician is typically interested in the test's positive predictive value – i.e., the proportion of diseased people among those with a positive test, and in its negative predictive value – i.e., the proportion of non-diseased people among those with a negative test.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com