Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(59)
In current practice, CCPW is typically disposed separately as a structural fill in surface disposal areas, while FCPW is disposed as a dilute slurry (about 15% solids) in impoundments that provide an overall lower disposal cost (NRC 2002).
The CCPW is typically disposed dry as valley fills in mountainous regions and in embankments to develop impoundment structures in the Interior Coal Basin for wet disposal of FCPW as discussed later.
In contrast, FGD byproduct formed in oxygen deficient oxidation systems contains a high percentage of hannebachite (CaSO3·0.5H2O) to yield a material with no commercial value, poor dewatering characteristics, and that is typically disposed in landfills.
FCPW is typically disposed as: (1) a slurry contained within an embankment constructed of CCPW (conventional practice) or incised ponds, (2) dewatered FCPW (50%70%% solids), contained within CCPW embankments as illustrated in Fig. 1, or potentially (3) a mono-fill constructed of a blend of CCPW and dewatered FCPW.
Municipal waste is typically disposed of in open dumps (with the exception of South Africa) or sanitary landfills (Johannessen and Boyer 1999).
They are typically treated as a waste, disposed together in ponds.
"This is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts if these types of bags are disposed of inappropriately; as such bags are typically made of heavier gauge materials and take longer to degrade".
While these are typically harmless unless the product breaks, these still need to be disposed of as hazardous waste, not in the regular trash.
In these settings, women are typically responsible for collecting, storing, and using water and for disposing of wastewater (1, 2 ).
The condensate from heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems has been identified as potential source of clean water, which is typically removed and disposed of in a sanitary drain.
They are typically nomads.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com