Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "are traditionally divided" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing how certain concepts, categories, or subjects are commonly classified or separated based on historical or cultural practices.
Example: "The seasons are traditionally divided into four distinct periods: spring, summer, autumn, and winter."
Alternatives: "are commonly categorized" or "are typically classified".
Exact(30)
Celtic and Rangers are traditionally divided between Catholics and Protestants.
Galaxies are traditionally divided into spiral and elliptical categories, but how one evolves into the other remains controversial.
As nutrients, minerals are traditionally divided into two groups according to the amounts present in and needed by the body.
Feet were used as a prominent source of texture, variety and rhythm, reminding you why lines of verse are traditionally divided into feet.
College and university expenditures are traditionally divided into six categories, of which the first two (instruction and academic support) go to the core academic mission, and the other four include housing, athletics, administration, dining and so on.
The atmospheric sciences are traditionally divided into three topical areas meteorology (the study and forecasting of weather), climatology (the study of long-term atmospheric patterns and their influences), and aeronomy (the study of the physics and chemistry of the upper atmosphere).
Similar(30)
Nubia is traditionally divided into two regions.
Both groups were traditionally divided into patrilineal clans and groups.
In the provinces theatre is traditionally divided into touring, repertory, and amateur companies.
Great Britain is traditionally divided into a highland and a lowland zone.
Tibet was traditionally divided into three regions, called the Chol-kha-gsum (chol-kha, "region," and gsum, "three").
More suggestions(13)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com