are to declareted

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence 'are to declareted' is not correct and is not usable in written English.
Instead, you could use the phrase 'are declared'. For example: All citizens are declared free from tyranny.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

CCGs are to set to be privatised.

Independent

Payments to doctors are to be slashed.

The New Yorker

Trials are to come.

The New Yorker

To delay is to disrespect.

The New Yorker

To "destroy" is to torture.

The New York Times

To judge was to dominate.

The New Yorker

To dream is to create.

The New Yorker

"To conquer is to live".

The New Yorker

To read is to twitch.

The New York Times - Books

To ask is to cringe.

The New York Times - Sports

To make is to do.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "are to declareted" as it is not grammatically correct. Use "are to be declared" or other appropriate alternatives.

Common error

The common mistake is using an incorrect form of the verb "declare". Ensure you use the correct passive form, such as "are to be declared", or active forms like "will declare".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are to declareted" attempts to combine an auxiliary verb with an incorrectly conjugated form of the verb "declare". As Ludwig AI points out, this is not a valid construction in English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are to declareted" is an incorrect grammatical construction and should be avoided. As Ludwig AI clearly states, it's not usable in written English. The intended meaning—a future declaration—can be correctly expressed using phrases like "are to be declared", "will be declared", or "are scheduled to be declared". Remember to prioritize correct verb conjugation for clear and effective communication. Since there are no real-world examples of this phrase, it is best to steer clear of it in any context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are to be declared

Adds passive voice to clarify that something will be declared by someone.

are to be announced

Replaces 'declared' with 'announced' to imply a formal communication.

are scheduled to be declared

Specifies that the declaration is planned or scheduled.

will be declared

Uses the future tense 'will' to indicate a future declaration.

are expected to declare

Indicates an expectation or anticipation of a declaration.

are set to declare

Suggests a firm plan or arrangement to declare something.

are going to declare

Uses a more informal future tense to express intention.

must be declared

Indicates an obligation or requirement to declare something.

should be declared

Suggests a recommendation or advisability to declare something.

need to be declared

Emphasizes the necessity of a declaration.

FAQs

What is the correct way to express a future declaration?

Instead of "are to declareted", use alternatives such as "are to be declared", "will be declared", or "are scheduled to be declared", depending on the intended meaning.

What can I say instead of "are to declareted"?

You can use alternatives like "are to be declared", "will be declared", or "are going to declare" depending on the context.

Is "are to declareted" grammatically correct?

No, "are to declareted" is not grammatically correct. The correct form would be "are to be declared" or "will declare".

What is the difference between "are to declare" and "are to be declared"?

"Are to declare" implies an active voice construction that requires an object, while "are to be declared" uses passive voice, implying that something is acted upon. An example can be "They are to declare the results" (active) versus "The results are to be declared" (passive).