are to cost

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are to cost" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate the expected price or expense of something in the future. Example: "The new project materials are to cost around $5,000, according to the budget estimates."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Arts

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

Tickets are to cost $30.

The New York Times - Arts

Adapters for laptops are to cost $179.

The New York Times

Renovations, to begin this month, are to cost $7 million.

The New York Times

Tickets are to cost $5 to $15, with a discount for groups.

The New York Times

Some "VIP hospitality" tickets are to cost £950 for the Stones shows next month, to mark the group's 50th anniversary.

Independent

According to the last wishes of Mr. Cunningham, tickets to his company's performances, which will be Dec. 29 to 31, are to cost $10.

The New York Times - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

The project is to cost $120 million.

The New York Times - Arts

It is to cost $198 million, with groundbreaking scheduled for this year.

The New York Times - Arts

The plan is to cost at least $5.5 billion.

The New York Times

Initially, the trip was to cost about sixteen thousand dollars.

The New Yorker

The proposed freeway for Route 72 was to cost $39 million.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider if a more direct phrase like "will cost" or "is expected to cost" might be clearer and more concise in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "are to cost" when referring to current or past expenses. This phrase is specifically for future projections. For current costs, use "cost" or "costs".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are to cost" functions as an auxiliary verb construction used to express a future cost or price. Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically correct and usable in English. Examples from Ludwig illustrate its application in news and media contexts to announce projected expenses.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Arts

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are to cost" is a grammatically correct construction used to denote a future or planned expense, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. It commonly appears in news reports and formal announcements to communicate anticipated prices or costs. While acceptable, consider that more direct alternatives like "will cost" or "is expected to cost" may enhance clarity. "Are to cost" conveys a planned or arranged estimation, and mainly used in contexts such as News & Media, Arts and Wiki.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

will cost

This is a more direct and common way to express future cost.

is going to cost

Expresses a future cost with a sense of certainty or planning.

is expected to cost

Indicates that the cost is anticipated, but not definitively confirmed.

is projected to cost

Implies a more formal or calculated estimate of the future cost.

is estimated to cost

Suggests that the cost is based on an educated guess or preliminary calculation.

will be priced at

Focuses on the price point at which something will be offered.

is set to cost

Indicates a planned or scheduled cost.

carries a price tag of

Informal way to refer to the total expenditure, focusing on the total amount spent.

entails an expense of

A more formal phrase emphasizing the expenditure associated with something.

requires an investment of

Focuses on the monetary investment that will be needed.

FAQs

How do I use "are to cost" in a sentence?

"Are to cost" is used to indicate the anticipated price or expense of something in the future. For example: "The renovations "are expected to cost" $7 million."

What is a synonym for "are to cost"?

Synonyms for "are to cost" include "will cost", "is going to cost", or "is expected to cost". The choice depends on the context and the level of certainty.

Is it better to use "are to cost" or "will cost"?

While both "are to cost" and "will cost" express future expenses, "are to cost" is more formal and often used in official announcements. "Will cost" is generally more common in everyday language.

What's the difference between "are to cost" and "are expected to cost"?

"Are to cost" implies a plan or arrangement, while "are expected to cost" suggests an estimation based on available information. The latter conveys a degree of uncertainty.