The phrase "are systematically asked" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process where individuals or groups are regularly and methodically posed questions or inquiries.
Example: "In the survey, participants are systematically asked about their preferences and experiences."
Alternatives: "are regularly questioned" or "are consistently inquired".
Screened patients were systematically asked for typical FD symptoms; each of the de novo patients reported one or more of the following: episodes of hand/foot pain during fever, angiokeratoma, and family history of heart disease.
Patients were systematically asked about the usual topography and time course of migraine attacks, and the existence of pain or stiffness of the cervical muscles.
I cannot find a study in which this question was systematically asked, but it doesn't take a trained sociologist to make a few educated guesses at the answers.
Also, participants had not been systematically asked for reasons for withdrawal or when returning after a period of non-response.
Finally, every working day during the study period, each eligible woman was systematically asked to participate in the survey and to provide signed informed consent to be sequentially enrolled.
Then patients were systematically asked about their functioning in six relevant life domains, namely, home situation, (resuming) work, household and leisure activities, mood and emotional distress, partner relation and intimacy, family and social life.
The following open questions were systematically asked to both groups (women with and without MVs) in order to identify whether women had difficulties filling in the CES-D scale and if so whether these difficulties were independent or possibly related to depressive symptoms: How did the woman perceive the CES-D questionnaire?
Mr. Grassley is systematically asking some of the nation's leading researchers and doctors to provide their conflict-of-interest disclosures, and he is comparing those documents with records of actual payments from drug companies.
The Congressional inquiry, led by Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, is systematically asking some of the nation's leading researchers to provide their conflict-of-interest disclosures, and Mr. Grassley is comparing those documents with records of actual payments from drug companies.
Thus, variables are not systematically asked for or documented for a given patient and decisions are not made from exactly the same set of criteria.
