are substantial for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are substantial for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express that something is significant or important for a particular purpose or context, but the construction is awkward. Example: "The resources we have are substantial for the success of the project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

The volumes of money are substantial for most European countries, but particularly for Germany because its trusted currency circulates widely in Europe.

The New York Times

The stakes are substantial for Boeing, which will have to pay penalties to some of the airlines that have been unable to use them.

The New York Times

The conflicts between these two demands are substantial for landscape modelers.

Landscape and Urban Planning

This is, of course, all about image, and the rewards are substantial for whoever gets the image right.

Forbes

These changes in average transfer rates and in the shapes of the transfer rate vs time curves are substantial for small va frequency parameter, Fp.

Chemical Engineering Science

But British Transport Police BTPP) warned: "The costs of graffiti are substantial for the railway industry in terms of repairs and clean-up, and can leave permanent scars on the infrastructure".

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

34 human-written examples

But it is substantial for town-level races.

The New York Times

Still, demand is substantial for so-called shelf systems, which are built around CD players.

The New York Times

Although there are no exact figures available, Mr. Cantor said the activity "has been substantial for the last decade".

The New York Times

The bonus phases out at highest income levels but is substantial for many upper-middle class couples.

The New York Times

While the indebtedness of households cannot be compared with Britain or the United States, it is substantial for some countries in the region.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, replace "are substantial for" with more precise alternatives like "are significant for" or "are crucial for" to better convey the intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "are substantial for" in formal writing. It's better to use alternatives like "are significant for" or "are essential for" to maintain grammatical correctness and clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are substantial for" functions as a linking phrase aiming to connect a subject with its significance or impact on something else. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this construction is not grammatically correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are substantial for" aims to convey significance or importance, it's considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI highlights this issue, suggesting clearer alternatives such as "are significant for" or "are important for". Usage examples primarily appear in scientific and news contexts, but the non-standard nature of the phrase makes it less suitable for formal writing. To ensure clarity and correctness, opt for more conventional phrasing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are significant for

Replaces "substantial" with "significant", emphasizing importance or consequence.

are important for

Substitutes "substantial" with "important", highlighting the value or necessity.

are considerable for

Uses "considerable" instead of "substantial", suggesting a noteworthy amount or degree.

are critical for

Replaces "substantial" with "critical", stressing indispensable or crucial nature.

are vital for

Substitutes "substantial" with "vital", indicating essential for life or success.

are essential for

Uses "essential" instead of "substantial", denoting absolutely necessary.

are crucial for

Replaces "substantial" with "crucial", emphasizing decisive or critical importance.

are meaningful for

Substitutes "substantial" with "meaningful", highlighting significance or purpose.

are material to

Uses "material to" instead of "substantial for", conveying relevance or pertinence.

are consequential for

Replaces "substantial" with "consequential", stressing resulting importance or effect.

FAQs

What's a more appropriate way to phrase "are substantial for"?

Consider alternatives such as "are significant for", "are important for", or "are critical for" depending on the specific context.

Is "are substantial for" grammatically correct?

No, "are substantial for" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. Alternatives like "are significant for" or "are essential for" are preferred.

When is it appropriate to use "are substantial for"?

Given that it's not grammatically correct, it's best to avoid using "are substantial for" in both formal and informal writing. Opt for clearer and more accepted phrases instead.

What does "are substantial for" mean?

The intended meaning is typically that something is significant or important in relation to something else. However, due to its non-standard usage, consider using more direct alternatives like "are significant for" or "are crucial for".