Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "are subsequently reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process where something is examined or evaluated after a certain event or action has taken place.
Example: "All submitted applications are subsequently reviewed by the committee to ensure they meet the required standards."
Alternatives: "are later evaluated" or "are then assessed".
Exact(3)
Methods for probing single cell physiology and metabolism are subsequently reviewed.
In order to understand how bacteria interact with dairy molecules, adhesion mechanisms are subsequently reviewed with a special focus on the environmental conditions affecting bacterial adhesion.
Two radiologists construct items for one subdomain which are subsequently reviewed by the other team members.
Similar(57)
Following the conference, each working group incorporated comments and recommendations into a final manuscript that was subsequently reviewed by two or more external reviewers not associated with the conference.
Charts for each of these 4,008 index visits were subsequently reviewed and diagnoses extracted by two trained chart reviewers with nursing backgrounds.
We can live with the errors that classification software make when its output is subsequently reviewed by hand -- for example when the F.B.I. uses it to try to locate potential child pornography sites.
Prior radiology reports were subsequently reviewed but not at the time of image analysis.
The operative reports of each patient were subsequently reviewed to determine the inlet and outlet angles used intraoperatively.
Medical records were subsequently reviewed to include those patients with a clinical course consistent with endogenous fungal endophthalmitis.
The incident, which occurred in front of the dugouts but was missed by the match officials, was subsequently reviewed on video by referee Michael Oliver.
The potential of geothermal energy systems in the UK was subsequently reviewed by Downing and Gray (1986a, b) and later by Lee et al. (1987) and Barker et al. (2000).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com