The phrase "are strongly consistent with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing evidence or findings that align closely with a particular theory, hypothesis, or set of data.
Example: "The results of the experiment are strongly consistent with our initial hypothesis about the chemical reaction."
Alternatives: "align closely with" or "are in strong agreement with".
Theoretical equations involved in order to describe the interaction are strongly consistent with the experimental data.
"Our findings and robustness checks are strongly consistent with African-American motorists driving slower during the daylight because they expect to face a higher probability of being stopped than whites at that time," the authors write.
Finally, it is important to note that the simulation results observed in this experiment are strongly consistent with those obtained in the previous experiment for the same grid size and data rate.
Finally, our behavioural results are strongly consistent with neuropsychological literature on body representation.
In contrast, the results of the analyses are strongly consistent with the multiple coherent units model.
Our quantitative proteomic results are strongly consistent with polysome analysis showing a significant decrease in translation well before any loss in cell viability.
Overall, the evidence is strongly consistent with the notion that peer effects are mediated by workers' sense of fairness related to relative effort.
Because subjects that received dexamethasone 4.1 mg per day in the phase III trial exhibited benefit from TTField therapy, the observed benefit is strongly consistent with an increased immunogenicity of cells affected by TTFields.
The results reveal that the analytical solution to the bending problem of FGM plates obtained using a Fourier series expanding is strongly consistent with the finite element calculation.
Indeed, when the estimates of Rdark obtained here are corrected for the underestimation derived from estimating this rate in the dark by multiplying them by the Rligth:Rdark ratio predicted from the regression equation in Fig. 3, the NCP predicted as the difference between GPP18O and this corrected R estimate is strongly consistent with the observed NCP (Fig. 5).
