Our main result can be stated as below.
The suitable weak solution established in [14] can be stated as below.
Thus, total time complexity can be stated as below: begin{array}rcl@ T=mathcal{O}(n.s)+ mathcal{O}(r.T)+ mathcal{O}(slog(s)) end{array} (7).
Magnetic field components can be stated as below: B ˜ y = S 2 + ω p 2 - S 2 β 2 ω p 2 ω cy S 2 e β 2 cA φ ˜ Open image in new window (8a) B ˜ x = - S 3 ω p 2 ω cy ω cz 1 - 1 β 2 2 e β 2 cA φ ˜.
Mathematically, the difference between the two approaches may be stated as below: begin{aligned} &CM_{mathrm{conventional}} = C_{FP} begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 eta& 0 end{bmatrix}, &CM_{mathrm{proposed}}(r,t) = frac{C_{FP}}{(1+r)^{t}} begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 eta& 0 end{bmatrix}, end{aligned} where, (r = mbox{discount rate}), and (t = mbox{time elapsed}).
The overall performance of knowledge was stated as poor (below the median), moderate (at the median), and adequate (above the median) [ 24].
The result on the global solution is stated as Theorem 2 below.
Meanwhile, death, anaemia and convulsion were stated as the effects in children below five.
As per overall knowledge categorizations, the overall beliefs were stated as appropriate if the scores were below the median line, as moderate if they were at the line, and as inappropriate if they were above the line [ 24].
The generalizability of the results for all in-patient medical rehabilitation clinics in Germany is limited because we only covered 15 clinics in southwest Germany, and the questionnaire return rate was below 50%%, which was stated as acceptable by Bungard and Jöns [ 108].
