are started already

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are started already" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey that something has already begun, but the construction is awkward and unclear. Example: "The projects are started already, and we need to catch up on the progress."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

It's started already.

The Guardian

"It is started already, the agents are working," he said.

Independent

"It is started already, the agents are working," said the Spaniard, 53.

BBC

There are so many things that Obama could be doing and should be doing that should be started already.

Huffington Post

Glucose solution feeding was started already after 1 h (labeled I in Figure 2).

Biotechnology for Biofuels

It is starting already.

The Economist

And we're starting already to see that effect.

Cornell University

I was starting already to show fluctuations and the idea was to smooth them out.

Huffington Post

Consequently, new Proficiency Panels are now being started or are already under way.

Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy

Already, they are starting to give discounts.

The New York Times

It's starting to do that already.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating that a process or activity has begun, use the phrase "have already started" or "are already underway" for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "are started already". The correct word order is "have already started" or "are already underway". Ensure the auxiliary verb precedes "already" for proper grammatical structure.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are started already" is intended to function as a statement of completion or ongoing status, indicating that an action or process has commenced. However, due to grammatical errors, its effectiveness is severely diminished. Ludwig AI points out its incorrectness.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are started already" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal and professional writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, better alternatives like "have already started" or "are already underway" provide clarity and grammatical accuracy. While the intention behind the phrase is to convey that something has begun, using correct grammar enhances communication and credibility. Pay close attention to word order and verb tenses to ensure your writing is clear and effective. The absence of examples reinforces the need to avoid this phrase in favor of more accepted alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have already started

Uses a more standard verb tense construction to indicate that something has commenced.

are already underway

Employs a different verb and preposition to convey the idea of something being in progress.

have begun already

Replaces 'started' with 'begun' while keeping the 'already' to emphasize the commencement.

are commencing now

Substitutes 'started' with 'commencing' to give a slightly more formal tone indicating something has just begun.

are in progress already

Uses the phrase 'in progress' to indicate the ongoing nature of something that has begun.

already initiated

Replaces the verb phrase with a single word indicating something has been initiated

are now active

Indicates that something is now in an active state, having been started

are up and running

An idiomatic expression indicating something is not only started but also functioning correctly

have been initiated

Passive voice construction indicating something was initiated in the past and is ongoing

are being implemented

Suggests that something is in the process of being put into effect, differing slightly from simply 'started'.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "are started already"?

The correct way to express that something has already begun is to use phrases like "have already started" or "are already underway".

Is "are started already" grammatically correct?

No, "are started already" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The auxiliary verb and adverb are in the wrong order. Instead, use "have already started" or "are already underway".

What are some alternatives to "are started already" that I can use in my writing?

Alternatives include "have already started", "are already underway", or "have begun already". These phrases are grammatically sound and widely accepted.

How do I avoid making mistakes when trying to say something is already in progress?

Pay attention to the placement of adverbs like 'already'. They usually come after the auxiliary verb (e.g., 'have') and before the main verb (e.g., 'started'). So, it should be "have already started" not "are started already".