are split with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are split with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct form would be "are split among" or "are split between," depending on the context. Example: "The profits are split among the three partners."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

35 human-written examples

The cost and risk are split with the franchisee.

The New York Times

The bedrooms are split, with one overlooking 84th Street, the other looking out to a garden.

The New York Times

Political science models are split, with the average model showing an Obama lead of a few 10ths of a point.

The New York Times

Once a consortium has sold enough oil to recoup its costs, profits are split with the government.

The Economist

Seventy-four percent of Republicans are opposed; Democrats are split, with 43 percent for and 44 percent against.

The New York Times

But the protesters, who call their protest Save the Revolution Friday, are split, with the Muslim Brotherhood, the likely beneficiary of early elections, refusing to join them.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

22 human-written examples

The $925,000 purchase price would be split with Shelter Island.

The New York Times

Some items are meant to be split with a companion.

The New York Times

Newcastle were split with every forward pass, as Willian, Eden Hazard and Pedro left them dizzied.

The Guardian - Sport

Social life tends to be split, with the New York crowd separate from the longtime locals.

The New York Times - Travel

The money was split with a relative and some was reinvested in new cattle.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "are split with". Instead, use "are split between" when dividing between two entities, or "are split among" when dividing among multiple entities. For example, instead of saying "The profits are split with the partners", say "The profits are split among the partners".

Common error

A common mistake is using "with" instead of "between" or "among" after "split" when referring to how something is divided. Always consider whether you're dividing something between two entities (use "between") or among more than two (use "among").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are split with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The verb phrase attempts to express the action of dividing something, but the preposition "with" is inappropriate in this context. As Ludwig AI points out, the correct usage should be "are split between" or "are split among."

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are split with" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. As Ludwig AI indicates, the correct alternatives are "are split between" when dividing between two entities and "are split among" when dividing among more than two. Using the correct preposition ensures clarity and maintains grammatical accuracy in both formal and informal communication. Due to the lack of examples, its frequency is nonexistent, and therefore, it's crucial to use the suggested alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are split between

Corrects preposition, when the split happens between two entities

are divided between

Correct preposition, when the division happens between two entities

are divided among

Replaces "with" with "among" to correctly indicate division among multiple entities.

are shared between

Uses "shared" instead of "split" and "between" to correctly indicate sharing between two entities.

are partitioned among

Employs a more formal synonym for "split" and corrects the preposition.

are allocated between

Focuses on allocation but specifying that the split is between

are allocated to

Shifts focus to allocation rather than division, using the correct preposition.

are distributed to

Focuses on distribution, implying a wider reach than a simple split.

are apportioned to

Suggests a more calculated distribution than "split".

are given to

Simplifies the concept to the act of giving, rather than dividing.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "split" when referring to division?

The correct usage depends on the number of entities involved. For two entities, use "split between", as in "The cost is "split between" them". For more than two, use "split among", as in "The inheritance is "split among" the heirs".

What can I say instead of "are split with"?

Alternatives include "are "divided among"", "are "shared between"", or "are "allocated to"", depending on the intended meaning and the number of recipients.

Is "are split with" grammatically correct?

No, "are split with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct forms are "are split between" (for two entities) or "are split among" (for more than two entities).

What's the difference between "are split between" and "are split among"?

"Are split between" implies a division into two parts or recipients, while "are split among" suggests a division into three or more parts or recipients. For example, "The responsibility is "split between" John and Mary", but "The inheritance is "split among" John, Mary, and Susan".