are split up with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are split up with" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a mix-up of phrases and should be rephrased for clarity. Example: "They are split up with their partners after a long relationship."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

'These grass margins are good for wildlife,' he explains, 'as well as keeping weeds at bay.' The bigger fields are split up with 'beetle banks', low bumps or hedges where predatory insects breed and nest, later feeding on aphids and other harmful bugs.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

"How is Ruby -now that she's split up with-Sean, was it?" "She doesn't tRuby -now buthatat doeshet mean she's split up with him.

The New Yorker

In recent weeks, analysts have said Time Warner could realize more shareholder value if it were split up, with AOL severed from the other units.

The New York Times

This summer, to improve management incentives, the company was split up, with three plants subcontracted to mill officers and the fourth to a Philippine investor, Ms. Wang said.

The New York Times

A spokesperson for Save the Children said that many migrants helped by their workers had told similar stories of different races being split up, with the lighter-skinned appearing to receive marginally better treatment.

Independent

The governance committee is taking evidence as part of a consultation over whether the palace of Westminster should be run by a clerk who also has duties to advise on constitutional and legislative matters, or should be split up, with a corporate-style chief executive taking over responsibility for the £200m-a-year budget.

The Guardian

Deady's family was split up, with Matthew sent back to Baltimore for two years.

Wikipedia

The few large ranches continue to be split up, with the resulting subdivisions priced at from $1 million to $7 million.

Los Angeles Times

In 1922, the property was split up, with the land given to the state of Connecticut and the buildings to the city of New Haven.

Wikipedia

By this time, the division's two brigades had been split up, with the 22nd having been deployed around Mersing and Endau on the east coast and the 27th in the west.

Wikipedia

Since this office is much larger than Oakland, workspaces are split up into four areas with each department assigned to a particular area.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "are split up with" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and grammatically correct alternatives like "are separated from" or "have broken up with".

Common error

The error in "are split up with" arises from incorrectly combining the passive voice ("are split up") with a preposition ("with") that typically indicates who someone is splitting up from. Correct this by using "are separated from" or "have broken up with" to clearly express the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are split up with" functions as a passive construction intended to describe a state of separation or division. However, as Ludwig AI highlights, it is grammatically incorrect due to the improper use of the preposition "with".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are split up with" attempts to convey a state of separation or division, it is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI points out, the incorrect use of the preposition "with" creates an awkward construction. More appropriate alternatives include "are separated from" or "have broken up with", which clearly and correctly express the intended meaning. Avoiding "are split up with" ensures clarity and credibility in both formal and informal writing. While examples can be found in diverse sources, that doesn't validate its grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are separated from

Focuses on the state of being no longer together, replacing the original's awkward construction.

have broken up with

Specifically indicates the end of a relationship, providing a clearer meaning.

are divided among

Emphasizes the distribution of something among different entities, replacing the relationship connotation.

are allocated to

Highlights the assignment of items or responsibilities, shifting away from separation.

are distributed to

Similar to 'are divided among', but with a slightly broader implication of dispersal.

are partitioned into

Suggests a formal division into distinct parts, changing the initial relationship context.

are estranged from

Indicates a severing of familial or close ties, offering a different nuance of separation.

are divorced from

Specifically relates to the legal termination of a marriage, narrowing the scope.

are disassociated from

Focuses on a formal detachment from an organization or cause, altering the relational aspect.

are split between

Highlights the act of dividing something into portions, changing the focus from people separating.

FAQs

What's grammatically wrong with the phrase "are split up with"?

The phrase "are split up with" combines a passive construction ("are split up") with the preposition "with" in a way that doesn't align with standard English grammar. It's typically more correct to say "are separated from" or "have broken up with".

Is it ever correct to use "are split up with"?

While you might encounter the phrase "are split up with" in informal contexts, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use more precise and standard alternatives like "are separated from" or "have broken up with".

What's the difference between "are split up with" and "are split up"?

"Are split up" generally means that a group or entity has been divided into smaller parts. Adding "with" implies a separation from someone or something, which isn't grammatically conveyed correctly. Alternatives include "are divided", "are separated from" or "have broken up with".

Can I use "are split up with" in professional writing?

It's not recommended to use "are split up with" in professional writing. Instead, opt for more formal and grammatically sound alternatives such as "are separated from" or "have broken up with" to ensure clarity and credibility.