are single with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are single with" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in a context where you are describing someone's relationship status, but it is more common to use "are single" or "are in a relationship with." Example: "Many of my friends are single with no plans to date anyone soon."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

If you are single, with no dependents, then you almost certainly don't, as no one will suffer financially if you die (you need to remember to review this if and when your circumstances change).

The Guardian - Money

Kimberly, Ella and Nicky are just three of the 300 people whom the NYU sociologist talked to for a seven-year project designed to tease out the full picture behind the extraordinary fact that more than 50% of adult Americans are single, with one out of every seven living alone.

The Guardian - Books

The majority are single with no family connection nearly 365,000 persons, with chronic homelessness affecting nearly 20% of them.

Forbes

Candidates that are single with no children are easy to pick up and place anywhere on the map that they are needed.

Forbes

Two of the three female justices are single with no children.

Huffington Post

If you are single with children, then make raising your children your top priority.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

She is single with no children.

The New York Times

He was said to be single, with no children.

The Guardian

Govou is single, with a 5-year-old daughter.

The New York Times - Sports

And he is single with no children, which is also a concern.

The New York Times

I was single, with no children and at the start of my career.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing someone's relationship status, prefer grammatically correct alternatives such as "are single and" or "are single with no", to ensure clarity and avoid potential misinterpretations.

Common error

Avoid using "with" directly after "are single" unless followed by "no" to prevent grammatical errors and ensure clarity. Instead, use conjunctions like "and" to connect additional attributes or circumstances.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are single with" functions as a descriptor, attempting to connect the state of being single with another attribute or circumstance. However, Ludwig AI marks it as grammatically questionable, suggesting it doesn't adhere to standard English grammar rules. Examples show varied attempts to use it in contexts describing individuals' situations.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are single with" appears in various contexts, it is considered grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI. The intended meaning typically involves providing additional context about a single person's situation, such as having children or certain responsibilities. To ensure clarity and grammatical correctness, it is advisable to use alternative phrasings like "are single and" or "are single with no". Although examples can be found in news and scientific sources, its imprecise nature makes it more suitable for informal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is single with

Change in verb conjugation to singular form.

are unmarried with

Substitutes 'single' with 'unmarried', keeping the same structure.

are unattached with

Uses 'unattached' instead of 'single', providing a similar meaning.

are single and

Replaces 'with' to indicate a separate characteristic, changing the sentence structure.

are solo with

Employs 'solo' in place of 'single', maintaining the original structure but with a different connotation.

are single, having

Rephrases 'with' into a participle clause, providing additional information.

are not married and have

Breaks down the phrase into simpler components, explicitly stating 'not married' and adding 'have'.

are single while

Introduces a contrast or comparison, changing the relationship expressed in the sentence.

have single status with

Reorders the words to emphasize 'single status', altering the sentence flow.

are single despite

Indicates a contrasting circumstance, altering the meaning.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically sound alternative to "are single with"?

Consider using "are single and" to connect additional attributes or circumstances. This provides a clearer and more grammatically correct construction.

Is it correct to say "are single with"?

While understandable in casual conversation, "are single with" isn't considered grammatically correct in formal writing. It's better to use alternatives like "are single and" or "are single with no" for clarity.

How can I rephrase "are single with children" more clearly?

You could say "are single parents" or "are single and have children" for better clarity and grammatical correctness.

What's the difference between "are single with" and "are single without"?

"Are single with" (though grammatically questionable) attempts to indicate a condition while being single. "Are single without" clearly indicates the absence of something while being single, such as "are single without children".