Eruptions of simple flows have not been observed in modern times and are significant for models of crustal accretion in Iceland and other Large Igneous Provinces.
The implementation of diffuse scattering is significant for modeling polarization behavior of the channel (e.g. the power transferred from one polarization to another) with a high degree of accuracy.
Comparing the simulation results with measurements, the following conclusions, valid for both scenarios, may be drawn: The implementation of diffuse scattering is significant for modeling polarization behavior of the channel (e.g. the power transferred from one polarization to another) with a high degree of accuracy.
Although, the change in chi-square value was significant for Model 2 and 6, in both cases, the Model was found to have good fit and the change in the CFI was less than 0.01.
The method regards a gene as DE if the coefficients of its fitted model are significant for any time variable.
Two of these markers are significant for both trait definitions and models used.
Model terms are significant for values of p less than 0.05.
The transitions of the state-machines represent the communication events between components, including whatever data that is significant for the modelling.
ANOVA analysis was significant for the model and both parameters gave (Prob > F) less than 0.0001 for the model and the PSOM parameter, and (Prob > F) = 0.0268 for the cellulase parameter.
Using the original A > A cohort as a test case, the correlation between the reactivity component and the predicted reactivity was significant for both model i (Pearson's correlation test: A > A original p < 3.43e−17) and model ii (Pearson's correlation test: A > A original p < 4.41e−12), as expected.
Neither the main effect of time (F 9,176)=1.42, P=0.18) nor the drug-by-time interaction (F 9,219)=1.49, P=0.15) were significant for this model.
