Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "are significant differences in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing variations or discrepancies between two or more subjects, particularly in academic or analytical contexts.
Example: "In the study, we found that there are significant differences in the performance of students based on their study habits."
Alternatives: "there are notable variations in" or "there are meaningful distinctions in".
Exact(60)
Not surprisingly, there are significant differences in different regions around the world.
Although this core fold is conserved, there are significant differences in Cas6 enzymes from different species.
However, there are significant differences in this coupling for the different climate zones, especially for daytime.
There are significant differences in survival between cases with different tumor grades.
There are significant differences in development time for standards involving different organisation types and countries.
There are significant differences in socioeconomic and health status among different regions in China.
However, there are significant differences in the amount of protein binding to the different surface types.
Certainly, there are significant differences in outlook.
But there are significant differences in the present case.
Even among the rescuers, there are significant differences in what their families are receiving in charity.
But there are significant differences in the 2010 campaign.
More suggestions(15)
are sizable differences in
are vast differences in
are huge differences in
suggest significant differences in
are noticeable differences in
are noteworthy differences in
are vital differences in
are appreciable differences in
are major differences in
are prominent differences in
are remarkable differences in
support significant differences in
are significance differences in
present significant differences in
are other differences in
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com