After tools and methods have been shown to answer one question particularly well, they can then be generalized for additional questions.
This methodology was shown to answer the requirements of Health Canada's proposed labeling standard for individual gluten source declaration, in order to achieve its policy objectives (i.e., protection of sensitive consumers, while promoting choice).
The students' answers are shown to the audience under each question and presented as bars or as percentages.
The applications presented in this work have focused on the longest common extension problem that, after linear time preprocessing of a standard CGR index, it is shown to be answered in constant time.
Despite these concerns, well-developed and adequately validated PRO instruments have been shown to give answers that match the results obtained by the most expert assessors (indeed, that is the usual way their validity is assessed), and they appear to be particularly suitable in studies involving many investigators.
For example, a visual illustration was presented when asking patients about timing of their last blood pressure test; a standard drinks chart, plus the number of standard drinks in common bulk packages of alcohol was shown to assist in answering questions about alcohol consumption.
In addition, behavioral questions have been shown to elicit truthful answers from candidates, since the answers are based on concrete past experiences.
The gender and nationality of interviewers has been shown to influence the way respondents answer survey questions4.
In my joint work with Wajnryb [104] the DEF = DIFF question was shown to have a negative answer also for simply connected surfaces (indeed for some of the families of surfaces constructed in [82]).
When sensitive questions are involved, online questionnaires have been shown to produce more accurate answers and less non-response (Mustanski, 2001).
