are reviewed from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are reviewed from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of examining or evaluating something based on a specific source or perspective. Example: "The documents are reviewed from various angles to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the issue."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

These important issues are reviewed from these viewpoints.

Acta Materialia

To assess Mexico's current infrastructure trends, economic quantity stocks are reviewed from two distinct viewpoints.

Journal of Economic Structures

Different glass compositions are reviewed from thermal, chemical, mechanical, and electrical property point of view.

Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports

Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) biochemodynamics are reviewed from an environmental perspective.

Environmental Biotechnology A Biosystems Approach

A wide variety of architectures are reviewed, from sequential to simultaneous and preclinical to clinical.

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine

The most promising such techniques are reviewed from the standpoint of control engineers.

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

16 human-written examples

He has now proposed to cut the legal period in which privatisations can be reviewed from ten years to three.

The Economist

References were reviewed from each relevant paper.

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Thirteen patients with (UTLD) were reviewed from 1999 to 2014.

Insights into Imaging

A total of 61 cases (62.3% male, mean age 44.16 ± 19.17 years) were reviewed from 54 publications.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Records were reviewed from hospitalization to medical discharge or hospital mortality.

Annals of Intensive Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are reviewed from", clearly state the specific perspective, source, or viewpoint that the review is based on to provide context and clarity to your audience.

Common error

Avoid using "are reviewed from" without specifying what it's being reviewed from. For instance, instead of saying "The data are reviewed from", specify "The data are reviewed from a statistical perspective."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are reviewed from" functions as a passive construction indicating that something is being examined or evaluated through a specific perspective, viewpoint, or source. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

79%

News & Media

12%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are reviewed from" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate that something is being examined from a particular standpoint. As Ludwig AI highlights, it is common in scientific and formal contexts. When employing this phrase, it is crucial to specify the viewpoint or source to provide clarity. Alternatives such as "are examined through" or "are assessed from the standpoint of" can be considered for variety. Remember to avoid overgeneralization by always stating what exactly is being reviewed from.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are examined through

This alternative focuses on the method or tool used for examination rather than the source or perspective.

are assessed from the standpoint of

This phrase emphasizes the viewpoint or position from which the assessment is made.

are evaluated considering

This suggests a more comprehensive evaluation, taking multiple factors into account.

are analyzed based on

This alternative highlights the criteria or foundation upon which the analysis is performed.

are inspected according to

This phrase suggests a more formal or regulated inspection process.

are viewed with respect to

This alternative brings in a sense of consideration or regard when looking at something.

are considered in light of

This implies that new information is available and needs to be part of the evaluation.

are approached from the angle of

This suggests a strategic or deliberate way of examining the subject.

are interpreted within the framework of

This conveys a structured or theoretical lens for understanding the subject.

are understood through the lens of

The alternative shows the use of the term "lens" as a tool to understand something better, implying a different point of view.

FAQs

How can I use "are reviewed from" in a sentence?

Use "are reviewed from" to indicate that something is being examined or assessed based on a specific viewpoint, perspective, or source. For example, "The research papers are reviewed from a methodological standpoint."

What phrases are similar to "are reviewed from"?

Similar phrases include "are examined through", "are assessed from the standpoint of", or "are analyzed based on depending on the nuance you want to convey".

Is it better to use "are reviewed from" or "are reviewed by"?

"Are reviewed from" specifies a perspective or viewpoint, while "are reviewed by" indicates who is conducting the review. For example, "The policy changes are reviewed from a legal perspective" versus "The policy changes are reviewed by the legal team."

What does it mean when something "is reviewed from" a specific angle?

When something "is reviewed from" a specific angle, it means that it is being examined or evaluated with a particular focus or viewpoint. The choice of angle affects the aspects that are emphasized and the conclusions that are drawn. For example, the outcomes "are evaluated considering" safety, efficacy and cost.