are reported to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are reported to" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that information or claims have been communicated or stated by someone, often in a formal or journalistic context. Example: "The results of the study are reported to show a significant increase in productivity among remote workers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Tanks are reported to have shelled Rastan.

The Economist

Hundreds are reported to have been killed.

The Economist

Threats are reported to the Secret Service.

The New York Times

involving students are reported to authorities?

The Washington Post

The Tories are reported to be rattled.

The Guardian - Opinion

JMB cells are reported to be increasingly active again.

The Guardian

All sea burials are reported to the Environmental Protection Agency.

The New York Times

Two schools are reported to have been destroyed by shelling.

The Guardian

Some times are reported to the thousandth of a second.

The New York Times

There are reported to be six survivors," the statement read.

The Guardian

Three people are reported to have suffered minor injuries.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are reported to" when you want to convey information without explicitly endorsing its accuracy. It's a good way to present claims neutrally, especially in journalism or academic writing.

Common error

Avoid using "are reported to" excessively, as it can make your writing sound vague and impersonal. Consider active voice alternatives when appropriate for a more direct and engaging style.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are reported to" functions as a reporting verb construction in the passive voice. Ludwig AI confirms its use in conveying information attributed to sources, without directly affirming its truth. It introduces reported statements or claims.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

20%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "are reported to" is a very common phrase employed to present information attributed to external sources, commonly found in news and media and also science publications. As Ludwig AI indicates, it serves to relay claims or statements in a neutral manner, without necessarily confirming their validity. It's important to use this phrase judiciously and avoid over-reliance on the passive voice. Consider alternatives like "are said to" or "it is reported that" to vary your writing style. Be aware of the potential for vagueness and strive for more direct language when possible.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it is reported that

Rephrases the sentence structure while maintaining a similar level of formality.

are said to

Implies a less formal or less certain communication of information.

are believed to

Suggests that the information is based on a belief or opinion.

are understood to

Implies a general understanding or consensus about the information.

sources indicate

Emphasizes the role of sources in providing the information.

are alleged to

Suggests that the information is based on allegations that have not been proven.

accounts suggest

Focuses on the accounts or narratives that present the information.

evidence suggests

Emphasizes the role of evidence in supporting the information.

observers note

Highlights the role of observers in noting or commenting on the information.

are rumored to

Indicates that the information is circulating as a rumor and may not be reliable.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are reported to" in a sentence?

You can use alternatives like "are said to", "are alleged to", or "it is reported that" depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "are reported to"?

It is appropriate when you want to convey information attributed to sources without necessarily vouching for its accuracy. It's commonly used in news reporting and academic writing where neutrality is important.

What's the difference between "are reported to" and "are said to"?

"Are reported to" typically implies a more formal or official source of information, while "are said to" suggests a more informal or general source.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "are reported to"?

The phrase "are reported to" is inherently passive. If you want to use active voice, you might rephrase the sentence to something like "Sources report that..."