are replaced with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are replaced with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing substitutions or changes in one thing for another. Example: "In the recipe, the eggs are replaced with a mixture of flaxseed and water for a vegan alternative."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Old-fashioned rods and cables are replaced with electronic controls.

The New York Times - Travel

Each week, about 10 movies are replaced with new ones.

The New York Times - Tech

Workers are replaced with mechanical devices wherever possible.

The New York Times

However, an Active Directory group name cannot contain colons so these are replaced with hyphens.

Stanford University

Knowledge grows, but it also contracts as outmoded facts and theories are replaced with new ones.

Harvard University

If at any point the house's total surpasses 21, the user's cards are replaced with "BUSTED".

Cornell University

Strolls through the farmers' markets are replaced with trudges through the frozen food aisle.

The New York Times

With all three devices, the physical marks are replaced with projected laser beams.

The New York Times - Tech

Hot soups are replaced with cold soups, heavy cream with yogurt.

The New York Times

This problem won't be solved until the shuttles are replaced with a new vehicle.

The New York Times

PCs or servers are replaced with new products, whether or not there is any actual need.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are replaced with" to clearly indicate a substitution, ensuring that the context makes the reason for the replacement evident.

Common error

Avoid using "are replaced with" when merely adding something; this phrase denotes a direct substitution, not an addition. Ensure a clear distinction between supplementing and replacing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are replaced with" functions as a passive construction indicating a substitution. It shows that something is being exchanged for something else. Ludwig AI highlights its common and correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Academia

22%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are replaced with" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe substitutions. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage across diverse contexts like news, science, and academia. It effectively conveys the idea of one thing being exchanged for another, as evidenced by numerous examples from reliable sources. While alternatives like "are substituted for" and "are exchanged for" exist, "are replaced with" remains a versatile and frequently used option.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are substituted for

Focuses on the act of substituting something.

are exchanged for

Highlights the mutual exchange between two things.

are superseded by

Implies that something newer or better has taken the place of something older.

are displaced by

Suggests that one thing has been moved or pushed out by another.

are supplanted by

Emphasizes the replacement of one thing by another, often in a strategic or forceful manner.

are overridden by

Indicates that a rule or setting is being changed.

are converted into

Focuses on the transformation or changing of one thing to another.

are transformed into

Highlights a significant change in form or nature.

are switched out for

Implies a quick or simple exchange.

are swapped for

Similar to "switched out for", but with a slightly more informal tone.

FAQs

How can I use "are replaced with" in a sentence?

Use "are replaced with" to show that one thing is being substituted for another. For example, "Old methods are replaced with new technologies".

What are some alternatives to "are replaced with"?

You can use alternatives like "are substituted for", "are exchanged for", or "are superseded by depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "are replaced by" instead of "are replaced with"?

While "are replaced by" is also grammatically correct, "are replaced with" is used when specifying what the original item is being replaced with. "Are replaced by" simply indicates that something is taking its place.

What's the difference between "are replaced with" and "are substituted with"?

The phrases "are replaced with" and "are substituted with" are very similar and often interchangeable. Both indicate that one thing is taking the place of another, though "substituted" can sometimes imply a more temporary or experimental change.