Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are relative with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are relative with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to express a relationship or connection between two entities. Example: "The two variables are relative with each other in this study."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
are related to
are connected with
are connected to
are associated with
are proportional to
are dependent on
are correlated with
are linked to
are in relation to
are relevant to
are contingent on
are comparable to
are commensurate with
are further with
are related with
are compared with
are corresponding with
are familiar with
are relevant with
is relevant with
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
In other words, if someone wants to identify all of the delay parameters in the control loop, only the frequency responses that are relative with the control connected points need to be measured.
CH4, CO2, CO, H2O, and H2 are the main gas products from coal pyrolysis, and these gases are relative with specific functional groups of coal (Solomon et al. 1988, 1990a, b, c; Figueiredo et al. 1999; Kazuhiro et al. 2002), therefore, it is evident to quantitatively associate the gas outputs with the quantities of the functional groups.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
There are relatives with similar DNA going thousands of years back in what is now Iran, India, Syria, Israel and Turkey.
News & Media
Though "clear" here is relative, with Toronto FC trailing the Columbus Crew by three points for the final playoff spot with a game in hand.
News & Media
As we known, the precision of the depth sensing is relative with the period of the fringe pattern.
Peak 3 was relative with the cleavage of carbonyls, which can produce CO at a high temperature (Figueiredo et al. 1999).
According to Mie theory[18, 19], the resonances denoted as surface plasmon were relative with the onset of the quantum size and shape effects of Au NPs.
Science
It is known that the immune response is relative with the presence of parasite density.
Science
This uncommonly high frequency of tRNA genes may be relative with the instability of BZ region.
Science
The distribution patterns of gene density of these two chromosomes were found to be relative with the sGISH patterns.
Science
And indeed, in my family as in most Negro families, there were relatives with very little 'color added in' who passed as white.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming to express a relationship, connection, or association between two entities, use phrases like "are related to", "are connected to", or "are associated with" for grammatical accuracy.
Common error
Avoid using the phrase "are relative with", as it's grammatically incorrect. Instead, choose phrases such as "are related to", which accurately convey the intended meaning.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are relative with" attempts to establish a relationship or connection between two entities. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this construction is grammatically incorrect in standard English. Correct alternatives include "are related to" or "are associated with".
Frequent in
Science
66%
News & Media
34%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "are relative with" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that this error likely stems from an attempt to express a relationship or connection. To correct this, use alternatives such as "are related to", "are connected to", or "are associated with". While some examples exist, primarily in science and news contexts, they should be regarded as errors rather than accepted usage. Always prioritize grammatical correctness and clarity in your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are related to
This alternative employs a more direct and grammatically sound way of expressing a connection or association.
are connected to
This option uses a different verb to indicate a link or relationship between two things.
are associated with
This phrase suggests a correlation or link, often implying a cause-and-effect relationship.
are linked to
Similar to 'connected to', this phrase implies a direct relationship or dependency.
are proportional to
Use this when indicating that two quantities change in direct relation to each other.
are in relation to
This alternative suggests a comparative context between two elements.
are relevant to
This highlights the importance or pertinence of something in connection with something else.
are contingent on
This phrase means that something is dependent on another factor or condition.
are dependent on
This alternative clearly expresses a state of reliance or conditionality.
are comparable to
Implies that two items share similarities that make them suitable for comparison.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say something is related to something else?
Instead of using the grammatically incorrect phrase "are relative with", use phrases like "are related to", "are connected to", or "are associated with".
Is it ever correct to use the phrase "are relative with"?
No, the phrase "are relative with" is not considered correct in standard English. Use more appropriate alternatives like "are related to" or "are associated with" instead.
What's the difference between "are related to" and "are relative with"?
"Are related to" is a grammatically correct way to indicate a connection or association. The phrase "are relative with" is not grammatically correct and should be avoided.
What are some alternatives to saying "are relative with" in scientific writing?
In scientific writing, instead of "are relative with", use phrases like "are proportional to", "are dependent on", or "are correlated with" to accurately express the relationship between variables.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested