are refused with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are refused with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear when this phrase could be appropriately used due to its grammatical issues and lack of clarity. Example: "The requests are refused with no explanation." (This example is incorrect; a better phrase would be "The requests are refused without explanation.")

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

An investigation that found pregnant women's requests for lighter jobs are refused, with devastating consequences.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Claims that are the subject of any doubts will be refused with no opportunity of appeal.

The Guardian

Its requests have so far been refused, with the Church instead offering to give the book to the Pope "via an intermediary".

Independent

Claims which are the subject of any doubts will be refused with no opportunity of appeal, and all those that are agreed will be published online quarterly.

The Guardian

Her application was refused, with the Home Office telling her it "will not recognise a change to a name which is subject to copyright or trademark".

The Guardian - Film

Recently, however, her attempt to pay off a balance of £350 using cash was refused with the statement: "Sorry madam, we do not accept payments in cash".

The Guardian - Money

However, the initial offer is refused with Somerset County Council saying the fire service is currently meeting all needs.

BBC

In another Marine C was heard asking A if he should shoot the man in the head, which was refused with more offensive language as "obvious".

BBC

This was refused, with the comment that Paulet could travel as far on land as he could get in his barge.

Wikipedia

Prior to the team's formation, the ownership group attempted to establish the team in the British Columbia Hockey League but were refused with the league citing the lack of a competitive base for a northern division.

Wikipedia

She was refused with the excuse that she might "use it as a weapon", by the attendant who then gave an unopened can of beer to a nearby passenger.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "are refused with" as it is grammatically incorrect. Instead, consider using alternatives like "are denied with" or restructuring the sentence for clarity.

Common error

A common mistake is pairing "refused" with "with" when it should be paired with "by" to indicate who is refusing or restructured to avoid the preposition altogether. For instance, use "refused by" to specify the actor doing the refusing: "The request was refused by the committee."

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function is as a passive verb phrase, where 'are refused' indicates the action of being denied or rejected. However, the addition of 'with' introduces a grammatical error, as 'refused' does not typically take 'with' to indicate the reason for refusal. Ludwig AI points out the grammatical issues with this phrase.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Wiki

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

5%

Academia

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are refused with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies it as flawed, suggesting that it does not adhere to standard English grammar rules. While examples can be found, it's best to opt for grammatically correct alternatives such as ""are denied with"" or ""are rejected with"" or restructuring the sentence for clarity. The phrase appears rarely in various contexts, including news and media and wiki sources, but its use is not recommended in formal or professional writing. Remember to consider the proper use of prepositions to convey your message clearly.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are denied with

Replaces "refused" with "denied", which is a more grammatically sound alternative that maintains a similar meaning.

are rejected with

Substitutes "refused" with "rejected", providing a grammatically correct option that preserves the original meaning.

are met with refusal

Restructures the phrase to emphasize the act of refusing, enhancing grammatical correctness.

are turned down with

Replaces "refused" with the phrasal verb "turned down", which is grammatically correct and conveys a similar meaning.

are declined with

Uses "declined" as a substitute for "refused", offering a more formal and grammatically appropriate alternative.

are faced with refusal

Emphasizes the experience of encountering the refusal. The structure is slightly different and the meaning shifts slightly to the subject's experience.

are refused without

Corrects the common grammatical error of using "with" after "refused" by using "without" and therefore changing the meaning

are confronted with a refusal

Highlights the act of confronting a refusal. This rephrasing adds a sense of directness and challenge to the original statement.

were refused and

Changes the structure and the conjunction. The refusal is now followed by an additional information.

are refused by

Changes the focus from the reason of the refusal to the entity refusing

FAQs

What's wrong with the phrase "are refused with"?

The phrase "are refused with" is grammatically incorrect. The verb "refused" doesn't typically take "with" as a preposition to indicate the reason. It's better to use constructions like "are refused without" if indicating a lack of something, or restructure the sentence entirely.

What can I say instead of "are refused with"?

Instead of "are refused with", you can use alternatives like "are denied with" or "are rejected with". You can also rephrase the sentence to use "refused by" or "met with refusal".

How can I rephrase a sentence that uses "are refused with" for better clarity?

To improve clarity, rephrase the sentence to clearly indicate the reason for refusal. For example, instead of "The requests are refused with no explanation", say "The requests are refused without explanation" or "The requests met with refusal due to policy violations."

Is "are refused with" ever correct in any context?

The phrase "are refused with" is rarely, if ever, grammatically correct in standard English. While it might appear in specific, non-standard dialects, it is best to avoid it in formal or professional writing. Always opt for clearer and more grammatically accepted alternatives.