The phrase "are reasonable consistent with" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "are reasonably consistent with"? You can use the corrected phrase when discussing how two or more things align or agree with each other in a reasonable manner.
Example: "The findings from the study are reasonably consistent with previous research on the topic."
Alternatives: "are fairly aligned with" or "are somewhat in agreement with".
This interpretation of the Glass-Steagall Act is reasonable, consistent with the plain language of the statute and its legislative history, and deserves the deference normally accorded the Board's construction of the banking laws.
Therefore, the three hypotheses summarized in assumption (H0) are reasonable and consistent with the reality.
The abundance matches are reasonable and consistent with the presence of one titanium in each ion fragment cluster.
Our contact rate of 67.5% and response rate of 75.9% are reasonable and consistent with response rates obtained in population-based surveys conducted elsewhere.
An examination of the potential restrictions on speech or association that have been imposed by the regulations under challenge, demonstrates that the restrictions imposed are reasonable, and are consistent with the inmates' status as prisoners and with the legitimate operational considerations of the institution.
Taken as a group, these comparisons suggest that the estimates from our modeling study are reasonable and generally consistent with available monitoring data.
"Our network management practices were reasonable, wholly consistent with industry practices and..
"We believe that our network management choices were reasonable, wholly consistent with industry practices," Sena Fitzmaurice, a spokeswoman for the company, said in a statement.
Because it is likely that Congress did not consider the question raised by this case when drafting Section 201(c), because I think the District Court's reading of that provision is reasonable and consistent with the statute's purposes, and because the principal goals of copyright policy are better served by that reading, I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
Thus, the board's decision to offer what it determined to be the fair value of the corporation to the 49% of its shareholders, who would otherwise be forced to accept highly subordinated "junk bonds", is reasonable and consistent with the directors' duty to ensure that the minority stockholders receive equal value for their shares.
