Sentence examples for are probably unreliable from inspiring English sources

More importantly, our accuracy testing procedure identified two parameters that are probably unreliable: the present-day African effective population size, NA, which exhibited high bias (B), standard error (SE) and root of mean square error (RMSE) (Table 3), and the replacement rate, δ, which was sensitive to the shape of the prior distributions.

26, 27 These models serve as practical guidelines, particularly for radiation protection purposes, but lack sophistication and are probably unreliable at low and high radiation doses.

Furthermore, phenotypic tests such as acid production from cellobiose and citrate utilization, previously proposed to be useful for identification of E. anophelis (15 ), are probably unreliable in differentiating among Elizabethkingia species.

The results of this study indicate that models which use only one or two air quality variables, such as particulate matter [less than and equal to] 10 microm and sulfur dioxide, are probably unreliable, and that models containing several correlated and toxic or potentially toxic air quality variables should also be investigated in order to minimize the situation of model underfit or misfit.

page 6 GETTING LOST The atlas in your head is probably unreliable.

City officials and homeless advocates say that count was probably unreliable, however, because of unseasonably warm weather that discouraged people from seeking shelter.

Follow Mike PeAccordingitoeRichard Kaee

From these 238 pairs, the genetic distance in the component map was equal to 0 cM for 102 pairs and comprised between 0 and 1 cM for 66 pairs, indicating that their position in the r plot was probably unreliable and therefore could not be used to infer long distance LD.

But both sides admit that their surveys are probably highly unreliable.

Yet rsssf.com, which is probably less unreliable than Wikipedia, suggests Saleh Al Khilaiwi only scored in penalty shoot-outs during 143 games for his country.

Although it is well known that gene expression level is a key predictor of ω (reviewed by Pál et al. 2006 and Choi and Hannenhalli 2013), this factor was not considered in this study because our cDNA libraries were normalized prior to sequencing (Santure et al. 2011), which means that read depth is probably an unreliable measure of gene expression level.