The phrase "are perfectly comparable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the similarities or equivalences between two or more items, concepts, or situations.
Example: "The two products are perfectly comparable in terms of quality and price, making it easy for consumers to choose between them."
Alternatives: "are entirely comparable" or "are fully comparable".
With an infinite horizon, it is essentially impossible to combine the Pareto criterion and anonymity (permuting the utilities of some generations does not change social welfare) in a fully satisfactory way, even when utilities are perfectly comparable.
However, most characteristics are perfectly comparable between attenders and non-attenders, but non-attenders tended to be younger and therefore related to even less diabetes risk compared to attenders and mostly males, unable to attend because they were working in the fields or far from their home town and therefore unlikely to have an undetected diabetes.
The multi-sited exit polls were conceived so as to be perfectly comparable across countries.
For each offer, identities are constructed with equivalent skills (i.e., in terms of the level of education and working experience) and information, to be perfectly comparable differing only by name, surname, gender, city of birth, postal address, and e-mail address.
The validity of the PSYBOBA was shown to be perfectly comparable to that of the SDQ and PSC [ 24].
The two groups were perfectly comparable; no significant difference was found for age, sex, department, type of admission and ASIS (Table 2).
Furthermore, because critical illness is a dynamic condition, 2 days might not be perfectly comparable with regard to severity of disease.
Even after normalization, ULN corrected data may not be perfectly comparable across different laboratories and the associated variability might actually be misleading, possibly due to the fact that the "standard" for calculating ULN is not consistent.
In order for the results to be perfectly comparable, the mutant allele was not given a slight selective advantage after the mutation time (in contrast to previous simulation scenarios, as explained in the Methods section).
The aim of this study was to provide an objective measure of the suppression of irrelevant information (in a conjoined selective visual attention task) under conditions that were perfectly comparable from the viewpoint of the motoric processes involved.
