The phrase "are of lesser value" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the worth or importance of two or more items, indicating that one is not as valuable as the other.
Example: "In this market, the older models are of lesser value compared to the latest releases."
Alternatives: "are less valuable" or "hold less worth".
The two sketches are of lesser value, which the police estimated at a total of $17,000.
A royal commission in the territory might well go some way toward highlighting what we already know at the core of our dark national heart, but are loth to admit: a non-Indigenous assumption, seeded in the colonies, that black lives are of lesser value, still shamefully thrives in sections of our justice, law and order, and political systems.
The basic stance is: my needs are more important than yours, you are of lesser value than I am, and, therefore, I am justified in treating you however I like, to get my needs met".
There is no certainty, however, that such a measure would not invoke cries of discrimination from those who may misinterpret the measure as an indication that the body organs of such individuals are of lesser value.
Therefore, datasets collected before 2011 on IPF patients as diagnosed using major and minor criteria as defined in the 2000 ATS/ERS IPF guidelines [ 24] are of lesser value.
Moreover, by assuming a bell-shaped curve for responders, group means imply ranges and distributions for responses that are not correct when viewed from the perspective of individual patient responses, and therefore are of lesser value for communicating treatment expectations with patients.
Transatlantic can still make the case that the combination with Validus will be of lesser value than the standalone option.
You might end up keeping one player that's of lesser value, but the value of that lesser player, plus the value of the picks acquired exceeds that of the player you just traded.
In a letter to Ibn Tibbon, Maimonides clearly states that Avicenna's philosophy is of lesser value than al-Farabi's.
The Primary Zone generally supports the present population and is of highest conservation value, while the Secondary Zone is of lesser value but could accommodate expansion of the population given sufficient habitat restoration.
The way they value the ambiguous transaction is of lesser value than whey they have to exert effort to pay for something.
