The phrase "are objectionable to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express that something is considered offensive or unacceptable to a particular person or group.
Example: "The comments made during the meeting are objectionable to many of the team members, leading to a heated discussion."
Alternatives: "are unacceptable to" or "are offensive to".
Almost all those ends are objectionable to Pakistan, which while it calls for a stable Afghanistan, prefers a more loosely governed neighbor where it can influence events, if need be, through Taliban proxies.
Grit in the gears Ego goes solo Can stand the heat Open sesame A test of nerves A compromising position ReprintsThe orders are objectionable to many, and with good reason.
But the impeachment and removal of federal judges who issue rulings that are objectionable to some conservatives has been very seriously proposed by Representative Tom DeLay, one of the most powerful members of Congress, and other right-wing extremists in the Republican Party.
Taxpayers understand that it is their money being used to support these companies, so when the executives who lead these firms make decisions that are objectionable to the average American, there is understandably a public outcry.
At the heart of President Obama's announcement last week on the contraceptive coverage mandate are two goals: ensuring that religious organizations will not have to pay for or provide coverage for services that are objectionable to them and that employees of objecting religious organizations will have access to these benefits on the same basis as other employees.
Second, record whether you think the content is objectionable to you personally or whether it might be objectionable to others.
"Why would it be objectionable to return the items to their country of origin?
Any hospital, it said, was "objectionable to the best type of private families".
"If it is objectionable to limit employment by reasons of race, I think it is comparably objectionable to limit by reason of religion.
Why should a technology company in California be allowed to decide what is objectionable to the rest of the world, they ask.
