are not violating

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not violating" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when stating that someone or something is not breaking a rule, law, or agreement. Example: "The company assures its clients that they are not violating any regulations in their operations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

41 human-written examples

"We are not violating a client's privacy," he said.

The New York Times

"We are not violating any law," Mr. Duran said in an interview.

The New York Times

What city department should I contact to make sure they are not violating the building codes?..

The New York Times

Airbnb says people who use the service are responsible for making sure they are not violating local laws.

The New York Times - Tech

Burundi, South Africa, and the Gambia are not violating international law merely by announcing their withdrawal from the Rome Statute that created the International Criminal Court.

Harvard University

We are not reverse engineering a design, and are not violating patents due to the non-commercial nature of our project.

Cornell University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

19 human-written examples

Furthermore, the barrier Lyapunov function is applied to guarantee that full state constraints are not violated.

Neurocomputing

The participants recognize that responsible company actions alone cannot guarantee that human rights are not violated.

Harvard University

When they are not violated, Mozart's rhythms grab hold of our souls.

The New York Times - Science

(27) and (28) can be modified, provided that the prescribed design criteria are not violated.

International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering (IJASE)

The objective of this experiment is to show that the applications' QoS requirements are not violated.

Journal of Internet Services and Applications

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When assuring stakeholders about adherence to regulations, use "are not violating" with specific reference to the relevant laws or guidelines. This strengthens the assurance and clarifies the scope of compliance.

Common error

Avoid stating that actions "are not violating" without specifying what laws or regulations are being adhered to. This can weaken the claim and create ambiguity. Always provide context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not violating" functions as a declarative statement, typically used to affirm adherence to rules, laws, or agreements. It asserts that certain actions or entities are not contravening specified regulations, as evidenced by Ludwig's examples from news and academic sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Academia

20%

Wiki

13%

Less common in

Science

11%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are not violating" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression for asserting compliance with established rules, laws, or agreements. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread use across diverse contexts, particularly in news, academic, and general informational domains. To enhance clarity and precision, it is advisable to specify the precise regulations being observed, while avoiding overgeneralization. For more formal settings, consider alternatives like "are in compliance with". This complete guide provides a concise overview of the phrase's usage and best practices.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are in compliance with

Highlights the state of meeting requirements, offering a more formal and official tone.

are complying with

Focuses on the act of following rules or regulations, differing slightly in emphasis from avoiding violation.

are acting within the law

Directly states that actions are legal, removing ambiguity about compliance.

are adhering to

Emphasizes sticking to rules or agreements, presenting a more positive framing than avoiding violation.

are not infringing on

Specifically refers to avoiding the violation of rights or patents, narrowing the context.

are not contravening

Uses a more formal and less common verb, suggesting a more deliberate avoidance of conflict with rules.

are keeping within the terms of

Highlights adherence to specific terms or conditions, suggesting a contractual context.

are observing

Implies careful attention to and following of rules or customs, suggesting a proactive approach.

are respecting

Focuses on showing consideration for rules or laws, highlighting an ethical dimension.

are staying within the bounds of

Suggests remaining inside established limits or regulations, offering a more descriptive alternative.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are not violating" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "are in compliance with", "are adhering to", or "are not contravening" depending on the context.

What's a simpler way to say "are not violating"?

Simpler alternatives include "are complying with" or "are respecting", which are easier to understand in general conversation.

In what situations is it best to use "are not violating"?

Use "are not violating" when you want to emphasize that a specific rule, law, or agreement is being followed and not broken. It's useful in legal, ethical, and regulatory contexts.

How does "are not violating" differ from "are in compliance with"?

"Are not violating" focuses on the absence of breaking a rule, while "are in compliance with" emphasizes the fulfillment of requirements. The latter is often more proactive and positive in tone.