Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "are not systematically introduced" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the absence of a structured or organized method of introducing something, such as concepts, topics, or elements in a particular context.
Example: "In this curriculum, new topics are not systematically introduced, which may lead to gaps in students' understanding."
Alternatives: "are not methodically presented" or "are not organized in a structured manner."
Exact(1)
This may especially be the case for immigrant patients, who may lack knowledge of the structure and functioning of the Danish health care system, since immigrants are not systematically introduced to the health care system [ 61].
Similar(59)
POLITICAL convictions are not systematically rational.
The longer-term livelihood needs of refugees and displaced people are not systematically addressed (pdf).
It is because the explanatory variables are not systematically different.
Such datasets are not systematically available or comparable.
In eukaryotic cells, amyloids are not systematically associated with disease.
However, supportive needs are not systematically addressed.
Parliament also introduced a definition of "false self-employment" a type of abuse which exploits the fact that many regulations on working conditions which should be guaranteed under the directive, are not systematically applied to self-employed workers.
Fourth, selection bias may have been introduced because individuals were not systematically randomised to have their height and weight measured by a researcher; there was potential unrecognised selection bias by the investigators inviting participants to be measured, as well in participants who declined to be measured.
Details of these births were not systematically returned to the Scottish Morbidity Record 02 and are not included in any of the study cohorts, thus they will not have introduced any bias.
Yet their performance is not systematically monitored.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com