The phrase "are not specified for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that certain details or parameters are not defined or outlined for a particular subject or context.
Example: "The requirements for the project are not specified for the initial phase, which may lead to confusion among team members."
Alternatives: "are not defined for" or "are not outlined for".
However, these approaches are not specified for satellite imaging.
They are not specified for long chain waxes in crude oil.
The existing thermodynamic models (solid solution (SS) theory and multi-solid (MS) phase model) are based on complex properties, such as interaction coefficient, critical properties, acentric factor, solubility parameter, and molecular weight which are not specified for long chain waxes.
However, the complete oxidation of benzoate produces 30 electrons and requires terminal electron acceptors, which are not specified for this mode of growth.
The data are not specified for specialty.
To keep simple, cost compounds are not specified for each procedure (adverse events).
Nonetheless, in recent months the official media have published several articles denouncing calls (from whom is not specified) for the armed forces to be removed from the party's direct control.
Dollar amounts were not specified for the other projects, among them the restoration of West Street, which Mr. Pataki's letter said was likely to include "the tunneling of some portion" of the street, most likely the stretch alongside the trade center site, from Vesey Street to Liberty Street.
The efficiency of this method is shown in a case study with a 3-RRR parallel manipulator (note that this manipulator becomes kinematically redundant if the orientation of the mobile platform is not specified for a desired task), in which postures associated to four working modes are employed in such a way that parallel singularities can be avoided.
This result is not totally unexpected, as the fiber is not specified for the analysis of C2 compounds.
A significance level is not specified for the comparative human health risk assessment but for the environmental risk assessment: 'if relevant, a factor of at least 10 for the toxicity/exposure ratio (TER) of different plant protection products is considered a significant difference in risk' [[1]].
