are not readily quantifiable

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not readily quantifiable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing concepts, variables, or factors that cannot be easily measured or expressed in numerical terms. Example: "The benefits of community engagement are not readily quantifiable, making it challenging to assess their true impact."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

By definition, intangible costs are not readily quantifiable.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

5 6 In evaluating the impact of healthcare IT systems, it is conceivable that important qualitative benefits for staff, such as ease of working and reduced workplace stress, are not readily quantifiable.

British Medical Journal

In general, components defining the intrinsic value of an intervention are quantifiable from a universal standpoint, while extrinsic or system-related components are not readily quantifiable or quantification scales depend on specific local considerations.

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

These are important contextual factors for analysing prescribing errors [ 23]; however, with the exception of co-morbidities, these factors are not readily accessible or quantifiable.

Drug Safety

Discovery orders are not readily appealable.

The Washington Post

DVROs are not readily granted.

Huffington Post

The WA figures are not readily available.

Vice

These potential limitations are not readily resolved.

Plosone

"Funding is not readily available," Mr. Carrigan said.

The New York Times

That information is not readily available.

The New York Times

His worst injuries were not readily visible.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not readily quantifiable", ensure that the context clearly indicates what aspects or factors are difficult to measure. Provide qualitative insights or alternative assessment methods when quantitative data is lacking.

Common error

Avoid assuming that because something "are not readily quantifiable", it is unimportant. Instead, complement the lack of quantitative data with robust qualitative descriptions and contextual analysis to provide a more complete understanding.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not readily quantifiable" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating that the noun's value or impact cannot be easily measured or expressed numerically. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

30%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are not readily quantifiable" serves to express the difficulty in measuring or numerically representing certain factors or concepts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and its suitability for use in formal contexts. While the phrase is primarily used in scientific, news, and formal business settings, remember to provide qualitative context when quantitative data is lacking. Consider alternatives like "cannot be easily quantified" or "are difficult to measure" to refine your message. By understanding its nuances and usage, writers can effectively communicate the limitations of quantitative assessments while providing valuable qualitative insights.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cannot be easily quantified

Emphasizes the difficulty in quantifying something, using "easily" instead of "readily".

are difficult to measure

Focuses on the difficulty of measurement, a broader concept than quantification.

are not easily measurable

Similar to "are difficult to measure" but uses "measurable" as an adjective.

are hard to quantify

Uses "hard" as a synonym for "difficult", making it slightly less formal.

defy quantification

Implies a resistance to being quantified, suggesting it's inherently unquantifiable.

are beyond measure

Highlights the immeasurability of something, often used for abstract concepts.

cannot be expressed numerically

Specifically focuses on the inability to express something in numerical terms.

are qualitatively assessed

Indicates that something is evaluated based on qualities rather than quantities.

are subjectively evaluated

Highlights that evaluation is based on personal opinions and interpretations, rather than objective measures.

resist numerical analysis

Emphasizes resistance to numerical analysis and more appropriate for science context.

FAQs

What does "are not readily quantifiable" mean?

It means that something is difficult to measure or express in numerical terms. This can be due to its abstract nature, complexity, or lack of standardized metrics.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "are not readily quantifiable"?

It's appropriate when discussing concepts, variables, or factors that cannot be easily assessed using quantitative methods. For example, the impact of company culture /s/company+culture on employee well-being.

What are some alternatives to saying "are not readily quantifiable"?

You can use alternatives such as "cannot be easily quantified", "are difficult to measure", or "defy quantification depending on the nuance you want to convey.

How do I provide useful information when the benefits "are not readily quantifiable"?

Focus on providing qualitative descriptions, case studies, or expert opinions to illustrate the value or impact, even if it cannot be precisely measured.