are not directly

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not directly" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is not straightforward or immediate in relation to another subject. Example: "The results of the experiment are not directly related to the hypothesis we proposed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Weight and health are not directly related.

University of California, Berkeley

They are not directly affected by today's vote.

The New York Times

The information barons are not directly accountable to us.

The Guardian

But what about effects that are not directly economic?

The Guardian - Business

The legal rights of witnesses are not directly in jeopardy.

The Guardian - Opinion

"We are not directly addressing the particular allegations," she added.

The New York Times

It shocks us, even if we are not directly affected".

The Guardian

Yet such efforts are not directly tied to value creation.

Harvard Business Review

They are not directly represented in the object model.

Stanford University

These assignments are not directly calculated into your grade.

Cornell University

However, these two kinds of services are not directly compatible.

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are not directly" to express a nuanced relationship, indicating that while there may be some connection, it is not straightforward or immediate. This can add precision to your writing.

Common error

Avoid stacking multiple negations when using "are not directly". This can lead to confusion. Instead of saying "It is not that they are not directly related", simplify to "They are indirectly related".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not directly" functions as a qualifier, indicating that a relationship or connection is not straightforward, immediate, or obvious. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It serves to introduce nuance and precision in statements.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are not directly" is a versatile qualifier used to express that a relationship between two or more things is not straightforward or immediate. As indicated by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and frequently used across diverse contexts, including news, science, and academia. While alternatives like "are not immediately" and "do not directly" exist, "are not directly" provides a specific nuance suitable for a wide array of situations. When writing, avoid stacking negations and aim for clarity, such as rephrasing statements to use "indirectly" instead. Its widespread use suggests it is a valuable tool for precise communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

do not directly

Changes the verb "are" to "do" and removes "directly", slightly altering the emphasis.

are not immediately

Replaces "directly" with "immediately", indicating a lack of instant connection.

are not closely

Substitutes "directly" with "closely", suggesting a weaker connection.

are not explicitly

Highlights that the connection is not stated or expressed clearly.

are not plainly

Replaces "directly" with "plainly", implying the connection is not obvious.

are not obviously

Similar to "are not plainly", emphasizing the lack of an evident connection.

are only indirectly

Specifies that the connection exists, but through a mediated route.

are not intrinsically

Indicates the absence of an inherent or essential connection.

don't correlate directly

Highlights a more semantic transformation and focuses on statistical correlation rather than direct relationships.

are not fundamentally

Emphasizes that the relationship does not exist at a basic level.

FAQs

How can I use "are not directly" in a sentence?

The phrase "are not directly" is used to indicate that two or more things are related, but not in a clear or immediate way. For example, "These symptoms "are not directly related" to the medication, but could be secondary effects".

What are some alternatives to "are not directly"?

You can use alternatives like "are not closely", "are not immediately", or "are only indirectly" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "are not directly related" or "are indirectly related"?

The choice depends on the specific meaning you want to convey. "Are not directly related" suggests a lack of a clear, immediate connection, while "are indirectly related" implies that a connection exists, but it is mediated through other factors.

What's the difference between "are not directly" and "are not necessarily"?

"Are not directly" implies that two things are connected but the connection is not obvious or straightforward, while "are not necessarily" suggests that something is possible but not guaranteed.