Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "are not deficient" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something meets a required standard or is adequate in some way.
Example: "The resources provided for the project are not deficient, ensuring that we can complete our tasks effectively."
Alternatives: "are sufficient" or "are adequate".
Exact(19)
We have also proposed that this deficiency is not necessarily absolute, and hence DDs are not deficient in their perception of the symbolic system per se but rather in their association between a written digit and its corresponding quantity.
We learned that women are not deficient in endurance and stamina, and that running requires no fancy facilities or equipment.
They could choose to find out more about language varieties which are not deficient at all but complex and creative.
They depend on radar parameters, and in most cases, they are not deficient.
It is assumed that the soils are not deficient of essential nutrients needed for growth.
I think they are not deficient in natural understanding, but they have not the advantage of education.
Similar(41)
Comparison of patients who presented ACTH deficiency with those who were not deficient found no differences in terms of patients characteristics, cause of TBI, level of severity and level of injury.
The exrA lexA) strain was not deficient in Type II repair, but was deficient in Type III repair.
The umuC strain was not deficient in spontaneous mutagenesis, and the mutational spectrum was very similar to that for the wild-type strain (A133).
Second, we compared SRS scores between those who were deficient at two time points (mid-gestation and cord blood) and those that were not deficient at either time point and we compared SRS scores between those that were deficient at one time point (mid-gestation or cord blood) and those that were not deficient at either time point.
Even if you're not deficient, the standard daily supplement dose (400iu for children, 1,000iu for adults) is unlikely to do you any harm – although it can be toxic in vast amounts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com