are not cost efficient

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not cost efficient" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use it when describing how something is not cost-effective or economical. For example, "These solar panels are not cost efficient enough to justify the installation costs."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Translate data into individual stories to help tackle false perceptions: Speaking as a girl who grew up in a developing world having to compete for resources with my male siblings, it is important to target the erroneous perceptions of parents that investments in girls are not cost efficient.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Such designs are not cost effective, power efficient and also result in complex circuitry.

Smart Water

A fragmenting market makes it desirable for every car company to offer a wide variety of models, but their resulting small production runs are not cost- efficient.

Forbes

Is Amref doing a little of this and a little of that – a danger in aid projects - which dissipates effort and is not cost efficient?

The Guardian

They needed to invest in a new underwater vehicle that could deliver a high-definition camera down in the crushing depths where the R-12 lies, and renting one was not cost efficient.

The New York Times

The telemedical treatment is not cost efficient after the first year.

Health Economics Review

(And if you see a number of over a thousand dollars, as I did, it's hard to argue that it's not cost efficient to do so!).

TechCrunch

On the other hand, remotely located POS terminals (e.g., ticketing machines, and parking meters) require a wired connection which is not cost efficient and also difficult to be installed.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Vaccinating hobby farms is not cost efficient in a time horizon of a year.

Plosone

The results show that it is not cost efficient to vaccinate goats.

Plosone

This indicates that it is not cost efficient to vaccinate young stock.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When arguing against a proposal, use "are not cost efficient" to highlight that the benefits don't justify the expenses. Provide specific data to strengthen your argument.

Common error

Don't only consider the initial price tag when evaluating if something is cost efficient. Factor in long-term costs like maintenance, energy consumption, and potential hidden expenses for a more accurate assessment.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not cost efficient" functions as a predicate adjective, describing a subject as lacking in economic efficiency. As evidenced by Ludwig, this phrase is used to assess the value and practicality of various options.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are not cost efficient" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression to indicate that something's expenses outweigh its benefits. Ludwig AI validates this through numerous examples across News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business domains. It's crucial to consider long-term costs, not just the initial price tag, when determining cost efficiency. Alternatives like "are not economical" or "are not viable" can be used to convey similar meanings depending on context. Remember to use data to strengthen your argument against proposals that "are not cost efficient".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are not a good value for money

Suggests the return or benefit does not justify the expense.

are not economically sound

Emphasizes the lack of a solid economic basis or justification.

are economically unviable

Focuses specifically on the economic feasibility, suggesting the option cannot sustain itself financially.

are not worthwhile

Focuses on the lack of overall benefit or merit considering the expense or effort involved.

are not fiscally responsible

Highlights a lack of prudence in managing finances.

are a poor use of funds

Indicates that resources could be better allocated elsewhere.

are inefficient expenditure

Points out the wasteful nature of spending.

are an economic burden

Highlights the strain or difficulty caused by the cost.

are imprudent investments

Specifically refers to investments lacking foresight and good judgment.

are overpriced

Implies that the cost is too high relative to the quality or benefit.

FAQs

How can I use "are not cost efficient" in a sentence?

You can use "are not cost efficient" to describe options where the expenses outweigh the benefits. For instance, "Investing in that outdated technology and implementing the integration of external services "is not cost efficient" in the long run".

What are some alternatives to saying "are not cost efficient"?

Alternatives include "are not economical", "are not viable", or "are not a good value for money", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "are not cost effective" or "are not cost efficient"?

Both phrases are similar, but "cost effective" emphasizes achieving a desired outcome at a reasonable cost, while "cost efficient" focuses on minimizing waste and maximizing output for a given input. It depends on which aspect you want to highlight.

What makes something "not cost efficient"?

Something is "not cost efficient" when the resources consumed (time, money, effort) do not produce a proportional or worthwhile benefit. This could be due to high operating costs, low productivity, or better alternatives.