Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "are not conspicuous" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is not easily seen or noticed, often in a context where visibility or prominence is being discussed.
Example: "The details of the design are not conspicuous, blending seamlessly with the overall aesthetic."
Alternatives: "are not easily noticeable" or "are not readily apparent."
Exact(4)
They are not conspicuous allies, but they are friends, and useful ones.
Though politics and budding Foreign Secretaries are not conspicuous at King's, the political climate, to judge by the men and the minds that the college has produced in recent years, appears to be set, like Forster's, left of center, but veering toward extreme Liberal (in the British sense), rather than toward doctrinaire Socialist).
Colonies other than E. coli are not conspicuous because they are colorless or have a light grey-beige color.
Because there are not conspicuous dispersal barriers in the region, we suspect that explanations (1) or (2) are the most likely.
Similar(56)
These ants' nests aren't conspicuous.
Crime in Bashkortostan is not conspicuous.
A differentiating factor of intelligence is not conspicuous.
When the heating rate is slow (<20 °C/min), the crystal grain growth was not conspicuous.
"As long as I was not conspicuous, I had a choice," Perelman explained.
Drama was not conspicuous, except for the plays of Heiberg and Nordahl Grieg.
American corporate customers of Indian software companies were not conspicuous at this year's annual meeting.
More suggestions(19)
are not prominent
are not remarkable
are not apparent
are not visible
are not spectacular
are not evident
are not psychic
are not distinctive
are not salient
are not notable
are not noteworthy
are not noticeable
are not discernible
are not obvious
are no conspicuous
weren't conspicuous
isn't conspicuous
aren't conspicuous
wasn't conspicuous
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com